C
I am surprised that post forward was not on your wish list. It is something that Rasmussen is a huge proponent of so it would be mind boggling if it did NOT have it on a new chassis. Then again, how long did Burandt tell Polaris to put a tether on before they actually did. Sometimes figuring out how manufacturers think is more than a bit challenging. BTW, I agree with your assessment on T-mo.My hope which I think is somewhat realistic would be a taller and narrower chassis that's an evolution of the G4 chassis. I don't expect a ground-up completely new concept. I'm surprised to hear that one of the test riders is having engine problems, I would have expected a carryover of the existing 850/Turbo. Developing a new engine and a new chassis in parallel is a lot of engineering design/validation work to take on, especially right now. I'm not surprised to see a new generation in the middle of the existing parts shortages. In some cases the parts shortages might drive OEMs to develop new relationships with new suppliers that aren't constrained. It doesn't make sense to develop old parts with new suppliers so it's time for the next gen.
My wish list for changes:
Taller front spindles, maybe raiding the parts bin for the 600RS spindles on the mountain sleds (better deep snow clearance and shifting the COG higher to lay on edge easier)
Taller rear suspension to match the front, I don't really care about T-mo one way or the other, the riding deficiencies are mostly the rider
34" ski width
Keep the tunnel/track width
Narrower plastics and matching boards
More integrated surfacing between the skid plate, bottom of chassis, and running boards for better performance in deep snow; float better, hold an edge better, and push snow under the track for better traction and faster turns
Return of built in storage
Optional upgraded shock package from the factory
Optional gauge package that includes integrated GPS
High Performance boost cal for the Turbo