• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Time for the 159” to make a comeback?

Track size

  • 146 / wannabe kesterereke, friends dread him

    Votes: 2 5.6%
  • 155 / white truck w/white oakleys mandatory

    Votes: 11 30.6%
  • 165 / pow days only, offended by spring snow

    Votes: 16 44.4%
  • 159 / big brain things

    Votes: 16 44.4%
  • 174 / minimum 8 pack on board, more if sunny

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    36
J

Jaynelson

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
5,005
5,542
113
Nelson BC
With the 174 length being phased out, and the 165’s being so capable in the new machines, would this be a popular option if offered? The characteristics in the steep/deep between the 155 and 165 are distinct, seems the middle ground 159 might once again dominate the market IF it existed - thoughts? Or too many/enough choices already? I think it would sell very well, at least for the BC /big snow type crowd.
 

Chadly

Forum Expert
Lifetime Membership
Aug 28, 2013
2,314
4,565
113
Snohomish, WA
I watched Caleb do things on a 146 that many could only dream of doing on a 165. If you like work, the 146 is more than capable of doing what most people do on a 165. Snowmobile manufacturers need less options, not more.
 
C
Dec 14, 2020
493
682
93
I'll stay with my 165".

I don't need to bowtie and flip. I just want to enjoy getting there. When I'm worn down at the end of the day, there's nothing better than just grabbing a handful and casually shooting up and out.

I think a lot of the 146 guys are going to find they still need a 155 for the deeper days.

I know I'm far too lazy to take a 146 out.

I thought it was pretty entertaining watching Muskoka Freerider go from a 155 to 146 to 165. His amazement at how easily it climbed was fun to watch, especially following his struggle on the 146 where he had to pack a highway on some hills.
 

turboless terry

Well-known member
Premium Member
Jan 15, 2008
5,568
6,768
113
Big Timber, MT
I'd try one. Been a long time since i had one. Seems like 20 years ago. If they needed less options they could do away with the pro. Have a kaos with adjustable limit strap like doo. Long equals kaos and short equals a pro. I also bet there isn't that many 146s out west. Bet they sell more 154 or 5s than anything.
 
J

Jaynelson

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
5,005
5,542
113
Nelson BC
I watched Caleb do things on a 146 that many could only dream of doing on a 165. If you like work, the 146 is more than capable of doing what most people do on a 165. Snowmobile manufacturers need less options, not more.
Flash in the pan, or for areas with mediocre snow/no adventure style riding. Or the big jump guys. That muskoka/Caleb video shows how fun a 146 is trying to break trail in BC snow. I’d rather be at the front punching trail than at the black flipping over for the 10th time trying to make a hill. Owned 1 once…Meh. I’m also borderline old.

We sold 80-90% 163 for years, now more like 60/40 …163/155
 

turboless terry

Well-known member
Premium Member
Jan 15, 2008
5,568
6,768
113
Big Timber, MT
Flash in the pan, or for areas with mediocre snow/no adventure style riding. Or the big jump guys. That muskoka/Caleb video shows how fun a 146 is trying to break trail in BC snow. I’d rather be at the front punching trail than at the black flipping over for the 10th time trying to make a hill. Owned 1 once…Meh. I’m also borderline old.

We sold 80-90% 163 for years, now more like 60/40 …163/155
What is borderline old so i know where to place myself?
 

JH@CM

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Aug 12, 2018
493
770
93
160 would be great.

Let's complicate things even more with extra track/tunnel/rail lengths.
 
Premium Features