C
As the title states, I found a rock yesterday riding. Direct hit the spindle. slight bend in the a-arm, however, I crumpled the tunnel and broke the bulkhead in two. Luckily I was able to ride out to the truck. The sled just didn't drive well or sound too healthy... The good: I've got insurance, full coverage for these types of unforeseen problems. The Bad: just finished paying off the sled in the fall and the truck last week.... And it looks like it may dump this coming week... Talking to the dealer about getting a chassis the the front bulkhead, he mentioned that the 155 HAS the front bulkhead, only the 163 has the front cooler deleted. Now, I'm faced with a dilemma. It's obviously going to be a couple weeks until the sled is fixed. With the dealer doing a repair estimate, insurance doing their own etc. Then ordering parts waiting for them to arrive and getting them installed. I'm going to talk to the dealer about demo'ing an Rmk assault. As I'm starting to find SMALL drifts to jump, cornices to drop. And I interested in finding out what the difference in handling is. Being 6'2" with LONG arms I suspect I may like the wider front end without the sway bar. Now what I'm having trouble finding out. The weight difference between the Pro RMK and RMK assault is 18 lb's. Is that weight in the following? 1. Chain drive vs. belt drive. for roughly 2-3 lbs 2. shocks piggy back verses non for roughly 3-4 lbs 3. A-arms glued verses welded for 3-4 lbs. 4. Bracing accounts for the remaining 7 lbs? Looking through photos and threads, the tunnel looks like it may have more bracing at the front where the bulkhead meets the tunnel. I also noticed that the assault rail profile may be taller??? Anyone know any more details on the bracing or what the extra weight is from?
Last edited: