J
and remember back a few years ago!!! they all said the yamaha was a pos, heavy and know one would want one!!! now every yamaha on the hill is boosted and killin a$$. and im sure the doo will be to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
me thinks the doo boys should be thanking yammy for doing much of the leg work in getting turbos where thay are. comparing a day one turbo today versus when yammy hit the scene is the sillyest thing I've heard yet.
And NOBODY turbo'd the RX-1 motor (read stock R-1 motorcycle motor) ever before...nope NO info what so ever...just a brand new concept that "just happened" ...just one day a guy was luuking at his 'cummins and had an apifiny..."wonder if that terbo thingy would bolt onto my RX-1"??
THATS THE DUMBEST THING I EVER HEARD!!
I started a thread of in the Yamaha section..a little DOO support would be nice...BJ
Nope... more like a wicked slingshot!if anyone knows turbos??...they dont bang the drivetrain like NOS or a BB motor does.
....nice to have some comp FINALLY on the hills after I spent an extra $15,000 on my sled so I wouldn't get beat by a Skandic....
i dont understand why they are only putting it in a trail sled, its obvious what mountain guys want, and its huge HP toys as well, so slap a longer track on there and see who buys
Lets not forget that turbo's have been around longer than most of us have been alive.
Back to the subject- 200 to 225 HP at 10 to 12# of boost on the Doo 4 banger should be just right without having to tear into the motor to bulk up for higher boost.
I also would'nt even think of comparing Doo's 4 banger to Yammi's proven R1. Sorry Doo fans doo's 4 banger isn't in the same league.
OT
OT....I knew you couldnt read...and now you proved it again...
205 hp/135 tq @6.5 psi on 87 octane @ 8200-8400 rpm
230 hp/155 tq @ 7.5 psi on 92-94 octane @ 8200-8400 rpm
427 hp/275 tq @ 22 psi on 120 octane @ 8200-8400 rpm
bone stock motors..NO internal work done...see ya at the top...BJ
"Like I said, I like the manifold pressure in inches method better, it brings everyone closer to speaking the same language. To bad everyone is stuck on the "Pounds of boost thing....."
I'm not sure I understand. Pressure is pressure, .982 PsiG is the same as 2 In/HG. Aircraft/Industrial etc. use In/Hg because it is a finer measurment. The diffrence is if it is Gauge pressure (PsiG) or absolute pressure (PsiA). Absolute takes into consideration atmospheric pressure.