G
So I want a bit more track on my new (to me) 2007 600 RMK 144", and it seems like there are two economical options:
a.) find a takeoff 155x2.4 track and maybe even rails and use stock Polaris gearing, clutching, etc. for the 155x2.4"
b.) Tracks USA has a crazy cheap proce for rail extensions and a takeoff 159x2.25" Series IV track package.
Obviosuly I'll extend the tunnel either way, but I was wondering what y'all (who have WAY more experience with these sleds than me), would say about the performance differences of the slightly shorter track with deeper lugs vs. the longer track with slightly shorter lugs with this machine.
I'm not a hill climber, but I do like to play around, get into tight terrain and most often ride in deep, light snow here in SW Montana. I'm 6'1" and 200 lbs.
I'll be gearing and clutching for more grunt either way. No engine mods--stock reliability is the whole point of this sled, after riding a mod sled for the last five years.
OK...go
Thanks for your opinions.
a.) find a takeoff 155x2.4 track and maybe even rails and use stock Polaris gearing, clutching, etc. for the 155x2.4"
b.) Tracks USA has a crazy cheap proce for rail extensions and a takeoff 159x2.25" Series IV track package.
Obviosuly I'll extend the tunnel either way, but I was wondering what y'all (who have WAY more experience with these sleds than me), would say about the performance differences of the slightly shorter track with deeper lugs vs. the longer track with slightly shorter lugs with this machine.
I'm not a hill climber, but I do like to play around, get into tight terrain and most often ride in deep, light snow here in SW Montana. I'm 6'1" and 200 lbs.
I'll be gearing and clutching for more grunt either way. No engine mods--stock reliability is the whole point of this sled, after riding a mod sled for the last five years.
OK...go
Thanks for your opinions.