• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Gear ratio going from 8 to 7 tooth drivers

RACINSTATION

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jan 14, 2003
7,503
3,459
113
Idaho
What ratio numbers are you looking for?

With 19/50 gearing and 8 tooth drivers you are theoretically geared for 78 mph

With 19/50 gearing and 7 tooth drivers you are theoretically geared for 68 mph

With 20/49 8 tooth is 84 mph

With 20/49 7 tooth is 74 mph

These are just baseline numbers and don't come out 100% because clutching throws a nasty wrench in that equation.
 

MTN_VIPER

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
980
442
63
NW WA St.
fourstrokesolutionsllc.com
Here is a really cool interactive spread sheet that does all the calculations for you. Just type in your numbers to see the effective changes.
Special thanks to arcticchat members Nick and firecatsrt for posting this!
 

Attachments

  • snowmobile_gear_chart.xls
    20 KB · Views: 256

WyoBoy1000

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
11,213
3,928
113
Red Lodge MT to North, CO
here is what I'm looking for

I want to be at the same gear ratio of 2.45-2.5 on a 8 tooth, so if I go with a 7 tooth what would I put in, stock 12 gears ? 2.33= what that equal.

I'm looking for a number as in a calculating number

if I ran 2.45 gearing for a 8 tooth the ratio is 2.45 now if it is a 7% reduction.
2.45x.07=.1715 add that up to get 2.6215
so 7 tooth with 2.45 gears is 2.62

so stock 12 gears 2.33 if I remember right
2.33x.07=.1631 + 2.33 =2.4931
7 tooth with 2.33 =2.4931

Is this 7% number accurate?
 

MTN_VIPER

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
980
442
63
NW WA St.
fourstrokesolutionsllc.com
Some of it comes down to available sprocket sizes also.

According to the calculator the closest you could get to a 20/49 8 tooth set up using 7 tooth drivers would be,

22/48 (2.18 ratio) with 7 tooth drivers would be approx 1.26 mph slower at 1 to 1 clutch shift out.
22/47 (2.13 ratio) with 7 tooth drivers would be approx .3 mph faster at 1 to 1 clutch shift out.

I would think that the 22/48 7 tooth would be just about ideal on a mountain sled, if your goal is to stay near the 20/49 8 tooth drive ratio.:thumb:
 
Last edited:

byeatts

Well-known member
Premium Member
Nov 29, 2007
3,403
1,215
113
Some of it comes down to available sprocket sizes also.

According to the calculator the closest you could get to a 20/49 8 tooth set up using 7 tooth drivers would be,

22/48 (2.18 ratio) with 7 tooth drivers would be approx 1.26 mph slower at 1 to 1 clutch shift out.
22/47 (2.13 ratio) with 7 tooth drivers would be approx .3 mph faster at 1 to 1 clutch shift out.

I would think that the 22/48 7 tooth would be just about ideal on a mountain sled, if your goal is to stay near the 20/49 8 tooth drive ratio.:thumb:

just for learning purposes , if you had 8 tooth @ 2.52 pitch they measure 22.68 cir. 7 tooth 3 inch pitch 21 inch. 22.68-21/22.68 gives 7.4%reduction. Drivers never measure the teeth x pitch and Avids run even smaller. I have the actual Circumference written down at the office and recall them near 20.5 cir. I run 2.4 gearing with my 7 tooths and am right at 1-1 ratio clutch shift on a Doo w/ 3 inch
 

B&M Fabrications

SnoWest Sponsor
Lifetime Membership
Aug 3, 2011
800
803
93
North Branch, MN
www.bmfabrications.com
just for learning purposes , if you had 8 tooth @ 2.52 pitch they measure 22.68 cir. 7 tooth 3 inch pitch 21 inch. 22.68-21/22.68 gives 7.4%reduction. Drivers never measure the teeth x pitch and Avids run even smaller. I have the actual Circumference written down at the office and recall them near 20.5 cir. I run 2.4 gearing with my 7 tooths and am right at 1-1 ratio clutch shift on a Doo w/ 3 inch

Your math is right. We find the poo drivers are a little over pitched. I'm sure that Wyoboy is going from 8 tooth 3.0 pitch to 7s.

7÷8 = .875 meaning 7 tooths are 87.5% the size of 8s, giving 12.5% reduction.

If he's running 2.45 gearing a 12.5% reduction equals 2.14375. Seems a little steep to me but the math works.
 

WyoBoy1000

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
11,213
3,928
113
Red Lodge MT to North, CO
a 12.5% reduction would read as a gear ratio of 2.756.

2.45x0.125=.30625 then you add that number to the 2.45 + .30625 = 2.756

So if 12.5% is correct then
21/49 = 2.333
2.333x.125=0.291625
0.291625+2.333=2.624625

So to change drivers with a stock 12 setup from 8 to 7 tooth it would be like gearing down to 2.62. Way to low

But to go from a 21 up to a 24 (8 tooth) its a 14.29% increase. So going down its a 12.5% decrease, this is a little confusing, lol.

But what is correct 7% 12.5% ???

Obviously since this is a cat it would be going from a 8x3.0 to a 7x3.0 tooth and pitch

which technically 8x3 = 24 7x3=21 percentage decrease from 24 - 21 = 12.5% But I'm not a 100% thats how it works
 
Last edited:

WyoBoy1000

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
11,213
3,928
113
Red Lodge MT to North, CO
It seems like you would have to run 21/47 to get to around the 2.5 ratio I want

21/47=2.238
2.238x(12.5%) .125= 0.279
2.238+.279= 2.52

So I need a belt drive that come in around 2.22 to 2.3
 

richardderkevorkian

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 7, 2010
634
356
63
Soldotna AK
If I run 21/47 with 7 tooth it would be about the same ratio as running a 20/50 with a 8 tooth. So it would be geared down slightly from the stock 12 2.33 to 2.52.

The stock 14 gears run a higher overdrive than this would

I ordered 2.33 from tki to run on my 13 with a 156x3 with 7 tooth drivers.

I think the gear ratios people are running on these things to save belts are rediculous. I ran 21/42 with 3.0 pitch 8s for years and years on a mountain cat without ever burning belts.

IMO if you gear to low you never load the motor and lose performance
 

WyoBoy1000

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
11,213
3,928
113
Red Lodge MT to North, CO
Agreed, plus the design of the clutch weights didn't change. The gear down was cats bandaid for a bad setup and I have yet to see performance gains from any gear down. Longer belt life maybe but they never felt right.
 

summ8rmk

Most handsome
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Feb 16, 2008
12,368
6,039
113
yakima, wa.
3in pitch.
8 tooth.
3x8=24" circumference. ÷ 3.14 = 7.6" dia.
3x7=21" circumference. ÷ 3.14 = 6.6"dia.

12.5% smaller
 
Last edited:

summ8rmk

Most handsome
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Feb 16, 2008
12,368
6,039
113
yakima, wa.
I did not measure but, math doesn't lie. Un less my math is wrong, the measurement is close to those numbers.
3in pitch means 3inches between paddles, does that not also mean 3inches on center for the tooth on the driver? If so then....

3×8÷3.1416
=7.6394194041

3×7÷3.1416
=6.6844919786
 
Last edited:
Premium Features