Affidavits are evidence. And he did submit the evidence in the legislative hearings that I watched in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arizona.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Affidavits are not evidence until they are entered into the court. You could sign one today claiming that mafesto is a pedophile, which I’d say is likely as false as everything Rudy claimed... but until it was actually submitted in court as evidence it wouldn’t be worth any more than the paper it’s written on.
And the hearings you refer to? Like the one with the day drunk Karen spouting off? Or in the landscaping shop parking lot? Yeah right, that’s proof alright.
Why didn’t he submit that “evidence” in court and why did he even say “this isn’t a fraud case” in court when he had plenty of opportunity? Because, crazy as Rudy is, he knows what the penalty for perjury is...