Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can also lengthen the heim. Typically 5-6 threads will bring the rear lower pivot closer to a 90 deg. angle. Some forward lean is ok.
I just moved the pivot point to the forward hole which is the original hole. I was thinking maybe the back hole is for a 165 or 175?
I drilled the hole out. I think if I threaded the hym out like Tom suggested it probably wouldn't fold back the wrong way but even with it mounted on the front hole it sure seems to control the ski lift a lot better.
The rear-ward holes are to be drilled-out and used as the new mounting holes for the zmotion to function properly.I have a 165 and the ZRP rail braces + link has two options in the brace to mount the link but only the fwd holes lines up to my rail. I stare at it wondering if I need to drill out the rail to accommodate the aft hole on the brace. I have one of the off pattern rails though so I'm not sure if others have two holes there.
The rear-ward holes are to be drilled-out and used as the new mounting holes for the zmotion to function properly.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
In the very first photo that Chadly shows he has it in correct holes, but it collapsed forward. Why would it do this. I’ve never had this issue, but have ice age Bomber rails vs stock setup w/ brace.
Yep the stock T-motion arm has a stop on it that prevents it from folding forward. I see now what’s going on. If he lengthens the heim joint like Tom said he should be good and able to run it in correct position. I am also using Toms kit with the Z motion, just hadn’t run into this problem. Did it happen loading onto your deck? I could see it being possible if front track shock compressed while rear shock was fully extended.