BANNED?????? WHY??????????????
He got a two week timeout for some stuff he posted on a members page.
He will be back in one week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BANNED?????? WHY??????????????
right now your 270 HP kit is a 217 HP kit?.......you are nowhere close to 270 HP....not even close......if you are still running their box. did he get banned for this????He got a two week timeout for some stuff he posted on a members page.
He will be back in one week.
right now your 270 HP kit is a 217 HP kit?.......you are nowhere close to 270 HP....not even close......if you are still running their box. did he get banned for this????
numbers from our eddy current mustang 500 awd.....look at the dyno chart: does it look close to 165 disclosed hp(rzr 900)? funny stock run is spot on at 88 hp, exactly the hp polaris says. Now, the clutching coming with the turbo kit is off completely at sea level, so with the right clutching can be a few more horses but that is it. when done with mapping on the standalone ecu, i will post a video and a dyno chart.
the one thing amazing me is just a peak 98 hp,then falling on its face completely(less hp than stock).....stock ecu backing timing on boost like crazy(kinda on failsafe).
can we ALL keep it clean now?
numbers from our eddy current mustang 500 awd.....look at the dyno chart: does it look close to 165 disclosed hp(rzr 900)? funny stock run is spot on at 88 hp, exactly the hp polaris says. Now, the clutching coming with the turbo kit is off completely at sea level, so with the right clutching can be a few more horses but that is it. when done with mapping on the standalone ecu, i will post a video and a dyno chart.
the one thing amazing me is just a peak 98 hp,then falling on its face completely(less hp than stock).....stock ecu backing timing on boost like crazy(kinda on failsafe).
can we ALL keep it clean now?
I have altso been told this by other dyno tuners.glad to see precision's ban was lifted. nobody else can piss off so many people quite that fast...
and sure, im on the bandwagon. you just threw one of the most reputable turbo kit builders under the bus. you better have some REAL good proof as to why their kits are not what they say they are.
MCX has 1000x the reputation you do in this market, dont shoot yourself in the foot so fast this time around.
numbers from our eddy current mustang 500 awd.....look at the dyno chart: does it look close to 165 disclosed hp(rzr 900)? funny stock run is spot on at 88 hp, exactly the hp polaris says. Now, the clutching coming with the turbo kit is off completely at sea level, so with the right clutching can be a few more horses but that is it. when done with mapping on the standalone ecu, i will post a video and a dyno chart.
the one thing amazing me is just a peak 98 hp,then falling on its face completely(less hp than stock).....stock ecu backing timing on boost like crazy(kinda on failsafe).
can we ALL keep it clean now?
glad to see precision's ban was lifted. nobody else can piss off so many people quite that fast...
and sure, im on the bandwagon. you just threw one of the most reputable turbo kit builders under the bus. you better have some REAL good proof as to why their kits are not what they say they are.
MCX has 1000x the reputation you do in this market, dont shoot yourself in the foot so fast this time around.
So why is the peek hp so week?
many reasons, but most of all as to do with the piggyback design and programmation(a/f is not too bad) fighting the failsafe programming of the stock ECU, real bad clutching at my elevation.
One of your more stupid posts
why attacking me again.....you asked for proof , i'm giving you those proofs and now i'm stupid?
I have altso been told this by other dyno tuners.
So why is the peek hp so week?
many reasons, but most of all as to do with the piggyback design and programmation(a/f is not too bad) fighting the failsafe programming of the stock ECU, real bad clutching at my elevation.
One of your more stupid posts
why attacking me again.....you asked for proof , i'm giving you those proofs and now i'm stupid?
You have proved nothing. You claimed he mcx Nytro dynoed less then what mcx claimed. All people are asking is to show a dyno sheet of the mcx Nytro that you said you dynoed. So show us that sheet.
You can make a dyno say anything you want. Nearly all the data you see is "corrected" horsepower. Used right "corrected" is trying to correct for differences in temp, altitude etc. Used wrong it is just the BS factor times actual results equals what the dyno operator wants to see on the page. The best dyno is the comparison dyno. Running on the hill against the competition. MCX "compares" strongly to everything on the market. Chris Brown told me(MCX 240 kit at the time) my 240 destroys so called 280-300HP kits.
I really do not agree, dyno is å great tool.