I just got my new (to me) sled yesterday, and it's gonna need a track soon. The 141 on it is almost shot.
I've always read that the Challenger is the better track for California riding conditions, and that the Maverick is better in light, fluffy snow. But... didn't they say that about the Attack 20 too??
Reason I ask is that there are many more 153" Mavericks for sale than Challengers... and I don't want to spend $600 on a brand new track if I can avoid it.
Thoughts?
Rob
I've always read that the Challenger is the better track for California riding conditions, and that the Maverick is better in light, fluffy snow. But... didn't they say that about the Attack 20 too??
Reason I ask is that there are many more 153" Mavericks for sale than Challengers... and I don't want to spend $600 on a brand new track if I can avoid it.
Thoughts?
Rob