• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Obama going nuts with executive orders

S
Nov 26, 2007
1,248
267
83
80
Everett, Wa.
:eek:No matter how you feel about abortion this should P*** everyone off. It's bad enough the government takes our money and supports abortion he wants to return to sending our money overseas to support a crime against God and man.Swampy:mad::mad:

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama on Friday struck down the Bush administration's ban on giving federal money to international groups that perform abortions or provide abortion information — an inflammatory policy that has bounced in and out of law for the past quarter-century. Obama's executive order, the latest in an aggressive first week reversing contentious Bush policies, was warmly welcomed by liberal groups and denounced by abortion rights foes.

The ban has been a political football between Democratic and Republican administrations since GOP President Ronald Reagan first adopted it 1984. Democrat Bill Clinton ended the ban in 1993, but Republican George W. Bush re-instituted it in 2001 as one of his first acts in office.

A White House spokesman, Bill Burton, said Obama signed the executive order, without coverage by the media, late on Friday afternoon. The abortion measure is a highly emotional one for many people, and the quiet signing was in contrast to the televised coverage of Obama's Wednesday announcement on ethics rules and Thursday signing of orders on closing the Guantanamo Bay prison camp and banning torture in the questioning of terror suspects.

His action came one day after the 36th anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion.

The Bush policy had banned U.S. taxpayer money, usually in the form of Agency for International Development funds, from going to international family planning groups that either offer abortions or provide information, counseling or referrals about abortion as a family planning method.

Critics have long held that the rule unfairly discriminates against the world's poor by denying U.S. aid to groups that may be involved in abortion but also work on other aspects of reproductive health care and HIV/AIDS, leading to the closure of free and low-cost rural clinics.

Supporters of the ban say that the United States still provides millions of dollars in family planning assistance around the world and that the rule prevents anti-abortion taxpayers from backing something they believe is morally wrong.

The ban has been known as the "Mexico City policy" for the city a U.S. delegation first announced it at a U.N. International Conference on Population.

Both Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who will oversee foreign aid, had promised to do away with the rule during the presidential campaign. Clinton visited the U.S. Agency for International Development earlier Friday but made no mention of the step, which had not yet been announced.

In a move related to the lifting of the abortion rule, Obama is also expected to restore funding to the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA), probably in the next federal budget. Both he and Clinton had pledged to reverse a Bush administration determination that assistance to the organization violated U.S. law known as the Kemp-Kasten amendment.

The Bush administration had barred U.S. money from the fund, to contending that its work in China supported a Chinese family planning policy of coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization. UNFPA has vehemently denied that it does.

Congress had appropriated $40 million to the UNFPA in the past budget year but the administration had withheld the money as it had done every year since 2002.

Organizations and lawmakers that had pressed Obama to rescind the Mexico City policy were jubilant.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the move "will help save lives and empower the poorest women and families to improve their quality of life and their future."

"Today's announcement is a very powerful signal to our neighbors around the world that the United States is once again back in the business of good public policy and ideology no longer blunts our ability to save lives around the globe," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Population Action International, an advocacy group, said that the policy had "severely impacted" women's health and that the step "will help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies, abortions and women dying from high-risk pregnancies because they don't have access to family planning."

Anti-abortion groups and lawmakers condemned Obama's decision.

"I have long supported the Mexico City Policy and believe this administration's decision to be counter to our nation's interests," said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

"Coming just one day after the 36th anniversary of the tragic Roe v. Wade decision, this presidential directive forces taxpayers to subsidize abortions overseas — something no American should be required by government to do," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., called it "morally wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Americans to promote abortion around the world."

"President Obama not long ago told the American people that he would support policies to reduce abortions, but today he is effectively guaranteeing more abortions by funding groups that promote abortion as a method of population control," said Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee.

.
 
S
Dec 3, 2007
306
25
28
I hate to be so cliche as to use a line from the Godfather but I'm going to and say this "keep your family close but keep your enemies closer" we need to stay on top of what this liberal/socialist wackjob is doing at all times. We are in for a very long 4years. All I can say is stock up boys stock up while you can.
 
A
Nov 26, 2007
2,287
400
83
Arlington, WA
Good thing he is taking care of all the important stuff first. :rolleyes: I thought this country was in a finincial crisis and the world was coming to an end if we didn't elect Obama? I'm not impressed with his choices of what's important to the people of the US.
 

line8

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 20, 2008
1,558
532
113
West of East
Good thing he is taking care of all the important stuff first. :rolleyes: I thought this country was in a finincial crisis and the world was coming to an end if we didn't elect Obama? I'm not impressed with his choices of what's important to the people of the US.

That's just it. I don't think it is most important to the majority of the U.S. I think it was done to create a perception or an opinion from outside the U.S. The world is very very important to this guy. Remember he likes to change jobs so soon the presidency of just the U.S. might not be enough.
 
F
Dec 1, 2007
376
60
28
NORTH BEND
Very little hope.

I listened to the Obama administration today try and answer a question reguarding the closure of Gitmo. First and formost there is NO plan as to what to do with the animals within Gitmo's walls. Imagine that, close the most important prison on the planet.. housing some of the worst nightmares human civilization has ever seen and have NO FREAKING PLAN. He couldnt answer the question!!! The people in charge of our country are on the verge of bringing these prisoners to the mainland and once here these Islamofacists are well on track to recieve due process. SICKENING.
The ACLU will no dought fall all over each other wanting to defend these animals, all will claim torture and no dought the state's case may fail.

This could happen folks, I suggest that our goverment has recklessly put our safty in jepordy. Way to go Obama, for your precious photo op. signing perhaps the stupidest executive order ever! I hope the trade off was well worth it. I hold hold ALL elected represenatives responsible who didnt go ape chit over this.
 

Franz

Well-known member
Premium Member
Nov 11, 2008
191
77
28
Logan, UT
I still don't believe this guy got elected.:( I would have bet money that this wasn't going to happen. I say that based on his policies alone, got nothing to do with race. He's going to do alot of damage and I really don't think the people on the fence who elected him realize that. The media was extremely sucessful at making Bush evil, and not reporting anything positive that happened in IRAQ. Thats how we got where we are now. Next thing Obama will institute an 'adopt a terrorist program' to find the prisoners 'a home' after they close GITMO.
 
C
Nov 27, 2007
469
118
43
35
CDA
I still don't believe this guy got elected.:( I would have bet money that this wasn't going to happen. I say that based on his policies alone, got nothing to do with race. He's going to do alot of damage and I really don't think the people on the fence who elected him realize that. The media was extremely sucessful at making Bush evil, and not reporting anything positive that happened in IRAQ. Thats how we got where we are now. Next thing Obama will institute an 'adopt a terrorist program' to find the prisoners 'a home' after they close GITMO.


can we do what we want to them if we take them in lol:D
 
W
Nov 2, 2001
3,460
279
83
Boise, Id
All the Senators are already fighting over who's state gets to house them. Read, they see federal money, being spent in their districts.

Charge them all as spies, non-uniformed combatants, and line them up for the firing squad.
 
Premium Features