• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Matryx weight

edgey

Well-known member
Premium Member
Jul 9, 2001
1,050
557
113
I would like to know the weight of 155 matryx slash. Polaris would brag about the weight of the axys and pro and now nothing about weight. I'm a boondocker tree guy don't need a turbo.
 
M
Aug 3, 2012
23
26
13
It says 190kg on the swedish website for 155" 2,75"? Do they not have the weights on NA site?
Don´t know what that is in stone age weight but you can google.
 

Vern

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jun 14, 2004
2,455
1,285
113
hyrum utah
Thought Burandt said it went up like 4-5lbs from the axys, and I’ve read on the social media’s as much as 9 lbs over the axys. Haven’t seen anything official though.
 

MTsled3

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jan 8, 2012
722
685
93
Belgrade, Montana
I can't find specs for individual tracks, but using the compare function on their website it shows the Slash model gaining 4 lbs (419) and the regular non-slashed Matryx RMK gaining 13lbs (428) compared to the Axys RMK (415lbs)
 

edgey

Well-known member
Premium Member
Jul 9, 2001
1,050
557
113
155 Matryx Pro RMK is 428lb.. Its all on the Polaris website.

I see that now must of finally got everything uploaded to there site wasn't there when I looked the yesterday. Thanks!

Must be more
 

RMK-King

Super-Moderator
Dec 25, 2007
1,928
1,374
113
North Dakota
Some of the main weights for comparison, 8-9lb difference between the 2.75" and 3" tracks. Looks like a 4lb gain from Axys to Matryx.

Khaos Axys 155-415lbs
Khaos Matryx Slash 155-419lbs
Khaos Matryx 155 -433lbs
Khaos Matryx turbo 155-447lbs


Pro RMK AXYs 155-415lbs
RMK Matryx Slash 155 2.75"-419lbs
RMK Matryx Slash 155 3"-427lbs
RMK Matryx 155-428lbs
RMK Matryx turbo 163-447lbs
 
C

Clarke673

Somewhere between too dumb to quit and flat earth
Dec 2, 2007
3,138
483
83
Gardiner Montana
We all know that can has 20 pounds maybe more. Bring back track porting. Ditch some wheels. Everyone take off their super expensive panels and get tubawear panels? Can't be too hard. chris will have some under 400 by December.
 

Sheetmetalfab

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Oct 5, 2010
7,919
6,682
113
……..
We all know that can has 20 pounds maybe more. Bring back track porting. Ditch some wheels. Everyone take off their super expensive panels and get tubawear panels? Can't be too hard. chris will have some under 400 by December.

No wheels to “ditch”

Track is already center ported

Panels are tiny with not much there.

Thinking the turbo “silencer” might have 5-7 pounds available to lose while keeping the dual path.

I’m thinking my sled will only gain weight.

A arms

Front bumper

Fuel caddy

Tunnel storage
 

edgey

Well-known member
Premium Member
Jul 9, 2001
1,050
557
113
Well that stinks I was hoping with the shorter tunnel they would get back to what the 16 axys weighed. I know there's 8# more in the 850 motor, but the 2.75 is lighter, the springs are lighter, and the tunnel is shorter. That new style cooler must have some pretty good weight in it.
When I jump on my daughter's 16 800 155 with diamond S can and the sls springs compared to my wife's 850 it does feel lighter.
 

ullose272

Well-known member
Premium Member
Aug 18, 2009
3,372
963
113
boise idaho
Well that stinks I was hoping with the shorter tunnel they would get back to what the 16 axys weighed. I know there's 8# more in the 850 motor, but the 2.75 is lighter, the springs are lighter, and the tunnel is shorter. That new style cooler must have some pretty good weight in it.
When I jump on my daughter's 16 800 155 with diamond S can and the sls springs compared to my wife's 850 it does feel lighter.
I think it will feel lighter since everyrhing is centralized. Way i look at it is comparing dirtbikes, my 05 yz250f felt way heavier riding than my 2012 kx450f, even thought the 450 was quite a bit heavier, and was 450 vs 250. Its all in the chassis

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
 

MKULTRA

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Dec 31, 2015
493
349
63
115
quebec, canada
Well that stinks I was hoping with the shorter tunnel they would get back to what the 16 axys weighed. I know there's 8# more in the 850 motor, but the 2.75 is lighter, the springs are lighter, and the tunnel is shorter. That new style cooler must have some pretty good weight in it.
When I jump on my daughter's 16 800 155 with diamond S can and the sls springs compared to my wife's 850 it does feel lighter.

it's like women, gaining a few pounds in the right spot is not always a bad thing

btw they don't need to brag about weight anymore because they have HP and HP sells sleds more than "low weight"
 

Wheel House Motorsports

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
29,933
5,968
113
34
SW MT
Wonder why the 146 weighs more than the 155. Stock 2" track weigh that much more than the 2.6"?
It has the longer non slash cooler on the 146 model to help crossover sleds cool better.

Also the little bit of weight seems to be in the panels/mounting. There are significant increase in overall fit/finish on these units. little tabs/brackets etc. The panels are MUCH more secure feeling on these then an axys. IM betting you wont see them flying off when you land a jump now.
 
S
Dec 28, 2009
109
57
28
It has the longer non slash cooler on the 146 model to help crossover sleds cool better.

Also the little bit of weight seems to be in the panels/mounting. There are significant increase in overall fit/finish on these units. little tabs/brackets etc. The panels are MUCH more secure feeling on these then an axys. IM betting you wont see them flying off when you land a jump now.
The 146 is only offered in the slash I believe.
 
Premium Features