S
It is too bad that it takes something of such magnitude to create traffic. I guess take em as you get em, no?
just wanted to note
- Thread starter AKpow
- Start date
Me niether, I just really really hate being talked to like I'm an idiot and have rude comments made about what I say, when I'm right and other people are clearly wrong. Especially when those people are those of higher authority on the forums.
We should be able to mention the "other" site.....after all, on the other site the most popular threads are all about snowest. For guys that are down on this site they sure spend alot of time talking about it:deadhorse: :face-icon-small-con :face-icon-small-win
S
I really think the moderators need to be a little more professional that you're being Christopher. I used to enjoy this site (while I'll never pay for a site, I do enjoy checking in every once in a while - or, I did until all this drama started), but after learning more about the moderators, I really do not enjoy it anymore. The above response is an example of your unprofessional attitude. Why don't you speak in full, complete sentences, or at least explain why someone's been banned, ect? Just because someone mentions another site (which is NOT EVEN A COMPETITOR - they don't charge, so how you can even come close to their numbers now is amazing in itself!) is not a reason to ban someone. All you're doing is pissing people off and making them leave - don't you see that? Stop the drama, start explaining yourself - until then, you're never going to have the numbers you want. I maybe only visit once a week, and this is my first post in at least a month. I would visit more if you gave me some incentive - otherwise, onto other more informative and friendly sites. I have enough drama in my daily life (in fact, the government and this site have a lot in common!).
Thanks and peace out! I'm sure I'll be banned after this, but oh well - not gonna cry over it!
A
one might get a better response
if there was a portion of the fees paid to this sight that were donated to SAWS or any type of organization that helps fight for motorized land use and keep public lands open. just a thought. I'm sure there would have been a more positive response from the user group here on SW. instead with the fees charged for this sight, you get super cool chat boxes, smiley faces that hide behind walls, and bold blue font stating you a paid premium member. for the non-payers it should say troll instead of free basic member. thats what i assume you think of us stopher.
if you were a sledder at heart i think you would have brought this to the table when harris publishing wanted to go pay.
whats really in it for those who pay. no satisfaction that some of there fee is going to something that can affect the entire community in a positive way.
If harris publishing or SW does anyhting for land use rights, then set me straight because that is something that should be known.
if there was a portion of the fees paid to this sight that were donated to SAWS or any type of organization that helps fight for motorized land use and keep public lands open. just a thought. I'm sure there would have been a more positive response from the user group here on SW. instead with the fees charged for this sight, you get super cool chat boxes, smiley faces that hide behind walls, and bold blue font stating you a paid premium member. for the non-payers it should say troll instead of free basic member. thats what i assume you think of us stopher.
if you were a sledder at heart i think you would have brought this to the table when harris publishing wanted to go pay.
whats really in it for those who pay. no satisfaction that some of there fee is going to something that can affect the entire community in a positive way.
If harris publishing or SW does anyhting for land use rights, then set me straight because that is something that should be known.
