• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Weighed my production 146M E-start Catalyst today.

R
Feb 26, 2008
618
219
43
you could not get the 146 without E start. But you could get a 154 2.6 or 3''. The manual that came with mine lists the 154 non E start 2.6 is as 16 lbs lighter than my 146 ES and the 154 non e start 3" is listed as 26 lbs lighter.
You should post the production spec sheet.
 

boondocker97

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Oct 30, 2008
4,077
2,795
113
Billings MT
The 2.6 lug 2.86p tracks are substantially heavier than the 3.0 3.5p tracks so it's to be expected the 146 isn't the lightest version.
 

madmax

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
4,489
3,146
113
Salt lake city
536 Stock, 510 with a can and no battery. no need to make people wait just becuase they dont have IG.
My 19’ alpha 800 165 3” full of fluids and no E-start was 538lbs. So not that impressed with a 146 600 weighing pretty much the same. My 22’ Polaris boost 165 2.75” track and no e-start was 532lbs, full of fluids, spare belt and plugs.

617C09DB-C2F4-4569-AB5C-F1626FDDA610.png E957B7F8-24A5-4A77-A280-36EF6B09CB3C.png
 
Last edited:
R
Feb 26, 2008
618
219
43
My 19’ alpha 800 165 3” full of fluids and no E-start was 538lbs. So not that impressed with a 146 600 weighing pretty much the same. My 22’ Polaris boost 165 2.75” track and no e-start was 532lbs, full of fluids, spare belt and plugs.
Well the 146 track weighs more than a 165 and this has electric start...
 

10003514

Well-known member
Premium Member
Dec 17, 2007
1,237
779
113
34
British Columbia
Wishful thinking that cat would drop a game changer, lighter than doo but looks like equivalent models Polaris is still the lightest sled even with the 2 gallons of extra fuel.
 
Premium Features