• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Heavy Steering

bholmlate

Well-known member
Premium Member
Dec 3, 2009
1,400
778
113
Reno, Nevada
You cant really argue tha logic. That is one creditable explanation as to why Yamaha used a softer center shock. whether that is their reason they did it we will never know unless someone has a big blue phone in there office with a direct line to the Yamaha gods :face-icon-small-ton
 
D
Nov 27, 2013
1,962
917
113
Mountain States
The least aggressive ski's are stock skis IMO ....Polaris Grippers out of all stock skis are probably the best of the bunch. The simplest way to decrease heavy steering caused by aggressive skis like PP or Mohawks or sleds with heavy front end for deep snow riding would be to decrease air pressure or spring load if your running coil over front shocks.... From the rear skid running your limiter straps all the way out will lighten up the entire front end including the sleds steering. Every 2S or 4S mountain snowmobile works

DPG
 
Last edited:
D
Nov 27, 2013
1,962
917
113
Mountain States
The Proclimb is at 14 degrees while the Pro RMK is at 12 degrees. Perhaps not significant to most but enough to be noticeable to those who have ridden very nimble steerable sleds before....It's really not that big of a deal I have never owned any sled where the suspension worked perfect or was setup the same for every rider.

DPG
 

bholmlate

Well-known member
Premium Member
Dec 3, 2009
1,400
778
113
Reno, Nevada
I may be wrong because its been a awhile but the first couple of years of the nytro MTX I think it was around 24 and then it decreased to 18 with the shorter front shock and newer front geometry That is still at least 4 degrees steeper then what the viper is today. Now please tell me that there is only one way to measure it because it. If there isn't there is no more reason to discuss the benefits if every MFR has a different way of measuring it
 
D
Nov 27, 2013
1,962
917
113
Mountain States
You might be think back when drop & rolls were popular. I'm told the actual measurement is verified under acceleration in a simulator with the skid transferring under load.

DPG
 
D
Nov 27, 2013
1,962
917
113
Mountain States
Here a useful YouTube video titled Project Limiter Strap when operating at lower rpm speeds such as tree riding.

PS: If your a trail rider this is not advices.


DPG
 
Last edited:

bholmlate

Well-known member
Premium Member
Dec 3, 2009
1,400
778
113
Reno, Nevada
If that title was supposed to act like a link it did not work for me. I just searched the internet using that title and its at the top of the search results
 

off trail mike

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
May 31, 2011
318
129
43
New Brunswick, Canada
Interesting read,

I'd be pretty safe in saying there is no sled out there save maybe PowerHouse Customs that has ever built a skid with an approach angle any where near 14 degrees. And even though AC, Yami, TS, Poo all claim 18 degrees up front, I've measure the XM, Timbersled, and AC and are all in the 20-21 range (relative to ground). Yes the 08 Yami's were at 25+ making them even worse trenchers.

You don't want to go flatter IMO anyway. Simply put, if you decrease the approach angle to something below about 18 degrees, you move the first contact with the snow so far back, you will automatically increase weight on ski's and thus ski pressure, and not in a small way.

My XM rules when it comes to steering performance, and Yami should take a page out of their book to understand weight transfer and light steering.

All front ends look similar, but if you study them closely, you realize the "compromises" made by each manufacturer differ dramatically. The poo handles really well because it has raked spindles, a longish wheelbase, and is light enough to pull it off. If you put the viper engine in there is would would feel sluggish and heavy because of it.. It's been done.

Bottom line is a 4S needs rather different front end geometry to make it turn easier and handle better. Pretty sure the ProClimb chassis wasn't designed with a 4S in mind when originally conceived. It works surprisingly well, but could be much better.

OTM
 
S

stingray719

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2008
1,698
670
113
Colorado Springs, CO
stingraymods.com
Interesting read,

I'd be pretty safe in saying there is no sled out there save maybe PowerHouse Customs that has ever built a skid with an approach angle any where near 14 degrees. And even though AC, Yami, TS, Poo all claim 18 degrees up front, I've measure the XM, Timbersled, and AC and are all in the 20-21 range (relative to ground). Yes the 08 Yami's were at 25+ making them even worse trenchers.

You don't want to go flatter IMO anyway. Simply put, if you decrease the approach angle to something below about 18 degrees, you move the first contact with the snow so far back, you will automatically increase weight on ski's and thus ski pressure, and not in a small way.

My XM rules when it comes to steering performance, and Yami should take a page out of their book to understand weight transfer and light steering.

All front ends look similar, but if you study them closely, you realize the "compromises" made by each manufacturer differ dramatically. The poo handles really well because it has raked spindles, a longish wheelbase, and is light enough to pull it off. If you put the viper engine in there is would would feel sluggish and heavy because of it.. It's been done.

Bottom line is a 4S needs rather different front end geometry to make it turn easier and handle better. Pretty sure the ProClimb chassis wasn't designed with a 4S in mind when originally conceived. It works surprisingly well, but could be much better.

OTM

Thanks for getting the thread back on topic. For those interested the spring that makes the Viper handle so much better (in my opinion) is specified above. Or you can search Google and screw your new sled up so bad it ends up in the "for sale" section. http://www.snowestonline.com/forum/showthread.php?t=385344
 
S

stingray719

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2008
1,698
670
113
Colorado Springs, CO
stingraymods.com
It's no surprise he's even disliked on Totally Yamaha

LOL! If you 3 disapprove I am doing something right. Yes the amount of private messages I get here and there prove your point eh? 3 guys from Wisconsin came out Thanksgiving weekend to ride with me but if you are a lurker on TY you knew that.

Its ok, sell your Pro and man up some and you too can ride a Yamaha.
 
Last edited:
D
Nov 27, 2013
1,962
917
113
Mountain States
No dought you got to love the box stock setting. No big deal the stock limiters were in hole 3 so I let them out 2 holes for better transfer of weight taking the load off the front end....I Can See My Ski Tips Now.....Also increased the center shock preload 1 full turn...Front ski pressure at 75#....Rear Shock 145 #...Still not perfect but that's what happens when you compare to what you previously had. Suspensions as I'm sure you know are trial and error most adjustment can be made right in the field as long as you do one adjustment at a time everything should work AOK...Would help to have more snow to really push the suspension to see how it really performs.

DPG
 
D
Nov 27, 2013
1,962
917
113
Mountain States
I posted a short Video on YouTube titled "Suspension Adjustment Results " this is as far as I got with the limited snow we have...Still room for improvement.

DPG
 

bholmlate

Well-known member
Premium Member
Dec 3, 2009
1,400
778
113
Reno, Nevada
Interesting read over in the ZBROZ kiss coupler thread the post is #12 from Yamahajohnson about the rear suspension development on the viper. if i knew how to steal the post and post in here i would but is it touches on certain things that have been discussed in this thread.
 
Premium Features