2018 - boost and 174. Gotta getcha next year for a double dip!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The 174 was needed because Doo never made it on top of the snow in any efficient way if the new sled is anything like The Poo's there will not be any need for anything longer than 165. The 174 was a way to compensate for a shortcoming of the old design , lets hope they got it right for us this time.
Based on this logic all of you "awesome" riders should really be cruising around on 146" tracks since there is no value to a longer track. Or just use a trail sled. the reality is I am more nimble on my 174 than I ever was on the 154. I think you little pixie sized boys should stick with shorter tracks and leave the deep snow and steep chutes for actual men with real sleds. Don't worry Brenda, we with the long tracks will be ones riding over to help you get your little toy sled unstuck. So adorable.
If BRP sees demand they will build it. It's a business, they're rational. I've heard several different marketing excuses from different sources. Not buying the calibration jingle for a minute. Not BRP's first rodeo here. If you want the 174" in the new platform let the manufacturer know directly. My 2016 174" wasn't built until July. Lots of runway where if we can show market demand.
might help to tell them how much extra your willing to pay.1000,2000,3000?