• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

What does Walmart cost America

S
Nov 26, 2007
1,248
267
83
80
Everett, Wa.
I have never set foot in a walmart store as I have allways been disgusted with how the megastores have destroyed the local small businesses and hurt all local economies, now someone has penned an article in support of my ideals. Especially read the bold red print. Swampy:D

It is time that Americans begin evaluating Walmart in terms of how much the huge chain is really costing us. It is time that we ponder the overall effects on, and the aggregate costs to, America as a whole. It is time that we discover which Walmart policies might be dangerous to America; which policies might be contributing to the loss of traditional American lifestyles and values; which policies might even undermine our national sovereignty.

There are three major areas that cause me concern and which I believe negatively affect individuals, families, hometowns, and eventually America as a whole: family life, money and the economy, and language.

Most people are aware that Walmart and other large chain stores have nearly devastated small town America, forcing local residents to travel further from their families to work. As these former business owners and their employees leave the small towns, they leave behind empty buildings, healthy family routines, and their children. Families and children are harmed by the stretching and broadening of family boundaries, especially in times of sickness, but in other important ways, as well. Children, especially the youngest and most vulnerable, are cheated and changed in both subtle and obvious ways.

At a local Amish factory (cook stoves) I visited recently, an employee and I began chatting. With great sadness he reported that his working away from the home was taking a toll on the children. He explained that his children were changing in ways that were causing concern. His home was probably within five miles of the factory, but still family behaviors, values, and ties were loosening. If even Amish families weaken under the stress of absent parent(s), it is no wonder that non-Amish families are so deeply troubled.

When I speak of this problem to parents, far too many assure me that things are just fine because, “The kids are in school all day while we work, then they go to a neighbor’s house until we get home at…” So much for homemade cookies and a loving parent to welcome children home; to ask about their day; to help with homework. So much for after school activities; for parental participation in schooling. Unfortunately, too many public school officials like this set-up just fine. School boards and administrators are not blind to the fact that long commutes prevent all but the most motivated parents from sticking their noses into classrooms; asking to meet with teachers; questioning materials, rules, competency, and policies

A second concern is Walmart’s eagerness and efficiency in transferring massive amounts of money out of America. This policy -- this loss of savings -- cannot help America and more than likely plays a role in undermining the economy of the nation.

We are frequently told how much money illegal immigrants send back home to Mexico. The amounts are staggering and I used to wonder how data was collected and how so many people would go about sending so much money; Walmart! Visit the banking service area and see for yourself how easy Walmart has made it to send millions of dollars out of America. I was unaware of this situation until recently, when I needed to send money.

The cost to me, a resident of Michigan, to send $800 to a resident of Wyoming, was almost $45.84. I was shocked and complained that it was usury. On a hunch, I asked the clerk how much it would cost me to send $800 to Mexico, instead. If I had sent the money over the border, it would only have cost me $12, plus I would have received a free telephone call to the recipient. Not only is such a policy discriminatory; not only will my $45 subsidize cheaper transfers for immigrants; but this disservice surely hurts the American economy.

Were that money to stay in America, it would be spent or saved here. If spent, it would help retain or create jobs. If saved, the money would provide financial backing for new industries; start-up or expanding businesses; for new construction; for repair or replacement of older equipment, bridges, highways; for innumerable other economic and human needs. With the money in Mexico, it will probably not contribute to growth in our economy. However, if people were charged…say $100 to send $800 (just about double what it costs to send money within the States) to send dollars out of this country, people might open savings accounts here, instead. I suspect that an increase in the cost of sending money across the border might even discourage some of illegal border crossings. Why is Walmart so eager to coddle and assist individuals who break laws by entering America illegally?

English is the official language of America and it is important that we keep it that way but…Walmart is not helping us! In fact, they are actively undermining our efforts.

I once read that there has never been a major country that successfully recognized and used two different languages as equals. Being bilingual is often an advantage to individuals, but not for nations. Norway apparently does fairly well, but I understand even they have division and conflict between the two language groups. Consider America if this trend continues: Will legal documents be written in English or Spanish or both languages? Will everyone need to learn both languages? That suggestion is crazy because Americans are no longer learning even English well. My English-teacher ear is continually offended by the number of grammatical errors I now hear…especially on the news programs.) “America the Beautiful” would sound most discordant if sung in two languages at the same time. However, that would be insignificant compared to citizenship, business practices, education, and all else divided by two languages.

Walmart and other merchants, plus manufacturers and producers, now make it too easy for Spanish-speaking immigrants to not learn English. America was made prosperous by a widely diverse population using the unifying English language. Walmart, with its bilingual policies, creates cripples by letting immigrants off the proverbial “hook.” Walmart is in effect sustaining a class of shadow employees; of minimally employable individuals. Immigrants cannot function and participate fully in America if they refuse to even learn the language.

I used to think that Walmart created these pro-division, anti-American policies out of ignorance and naivety. However, since Walmart recently joined forces with Obama for socialized medicine, I now find their globalist ways suspect; consider their un-American policies purposeful.
Americans must become more alert; more observant. We must learn to think in terms of cause and effect; to carefully assess everything --purchasing, voting, banking, media trusting, and all other decisions -- in terms of consequences, both short and long term; both personal and national. We must insist that English remain the official language of America, and we must encourage and help immigrants learn English. We must save our language in order to save our liberty. We must decide whether we look away as Walmart continues to send millions of dollars to Mexico for minimal charges or whether we convey our concerns to corporate headquarters, and put America first. We can choose to shop in stores that shun policies that undermine our families; our monetary base; our official language; and ultimately our sovereignty as a nation.

1-800-WALMART. Call them. I do.


Linda Schrock Taylor is a reading specialist and former public school teacher. She teaches English composition at a state university.
 
G
Nov 28, 2008
222
34
28
MN
I go to a walmart maybe once a year. i try to aviod it. My truck was in the shop getting the tires rotated and i needed something so i went to the walmart that was across the street from the tire store. Bad idea. I have never seen so many white trash low lifes in place at one time. It reminded me why I should not go their
 
A
Nov 5, 2008
193
42
28
Walmart prospers because governments have sold out America.

Federal government doesn't require china to hold up it's end of fair trade and and allows it to flood our markets with cheap crap while they take next to no American products.

Local government allow Walmart to come in and destroy local economies even though they have full knowledge of the effect of these giant stores.

If it wasn't Walmart it would just be someone else.

Don't hate the player,hate the game.
 
W
Jan 2, 2008
1,927
223
63
Walmart prospers because governments have sold out America.

Federal government doesn't require china to hold up it's end of fair trade and and allows it to flood our markets with cheap crap while they take next to no American products.

Local government allow Walmart to come in and destroy local economies even though they have full knowledge of the effect of these giant stores.

If it wasn't Walmart it would just be someone else.

Don't hate the player,hate the game.

yup, our country was sold out by govt then walmart capitolized on that by peddling cheap imported junk. Anti-America became vogue, and now everyone wonders why our country is going in the chitter.
 

tudizzle

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Mar 23, 2005
14,146
9,789
113
53
COLORADO
The truth will come out and surely Obama will be behind the whole thing...just give it about 8 posts :beer;
 
S
Dec 29, 2001
1,154
149
63
Brainerd,MN
I remember,...oh...... about 20 years ago roughly, Walmart used to advertise that nearly all items sold at a Walmart were made in the USA.

That concept sure got turned upside down, didn't it?
 
N

NDflatlander

Active member
Nov 21, 2007
324
40
28
Jamestown, ND
I'm sure I'm going to get some negative rep, but I shop at Walmart. I do most of my grocery shopping and household shopping there. I am not a big fan of the client base, but if it can save me a few bucks each time I shop I will go there.

I don't believe in holding loyalty to one company anymore including the mom and pop stores. My mom was canned from her job after working for the same company for 29 years because she spoke up about some of the questionable things that were going on within the company. Needless to say that company was out of business in 6 months. We have bought our farm fertilizer and chemical from the same elevator for as long as I can remember, but last year they charged us about $10K more than we thought we agreed to for chemical throughout the year. If the smaller companies aren't going to be loyal to me, I'm sure not going to pay extra to get the same treatment I could be getting in a box store. In today's economic situation it doesn't bother me to shop somewhere that I can save money and put to use in other areas of my budget.
 
P
Nov 26, 2007
144
21
18
living in wyoming we already suffer from a significantly higher cost of living when compared to populated areas. The economy of scale is against us in every area we spend money. Wal-mart is just about the only store where there is some decent selection of up to date products at good prices. Are we expected to forgoe that and purchase non-up to date products at higher prices. It is my perception that a town that has a wal-mart seems to prosper more thatn one that does not. If there is a wal-mart the residents actually stay in town to shop, eat out, go a movie and shop at more speciallized stores like sporting goods. With wal-mart in place they can get everthing needed and never leave town.

If there is no wal-mart the residnents end up traveling to larger towns(billings) to shop at the mall, eat out etc... just taking all their money out of town.

Just my 2 cents
 
S

Superjag

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2002
358
151
43
Saint Paul, MN
Please. If you believe that Walmart is anywhere near the top of the list in terms of things that need to be fixed in this country, you are sorely misguided. Dont' get me wrong, I try and "shop local" whenever I can, and I'm sure there are probably a number of things at which Walmart could strive to be better, but this outcry to demonize Walmart is a joke.

That article is a crock. Yes, I am naive enough to believe that Walmart detsroyed american family life. Not the demise of core family values and personal responsibility, or crappy parenting, or our willingness to let the ipod or computer babysit our kids.

Walmart did it.

With regard to the money. Let's see: Our government allows these certain individuals to come into this country and obtain employment, all the while knowing that they will probably send at least a portion of our wages back to families in other countries. Then, a multitude of employers hire these individuals, all the while knowing that they will probably send at least a portion of our wages back to families in other countries. There may even be unions who take in these workers, all the while knowing that they will probably send at least a portion of our wages back to families in other countries.

But it's clearly Walmart's fault that all this money is leaving our country so easily.
Give me a break. The money leaving is the symptom, not the problem.

But wait, there's more! Walmart is contributing to the downfall of this country by not "making" their employees speak english. But why pick on Walmart? What about roofing companies, the construction industry, assembly lines, and just about any other labor-intensive industry in this country? Been there lately? Trust me, most of them aren't too quick to demand that their cheap, ready-to-work unskilled labor go out and and get english degrees. Lets face it, a communication barrier makes one less likely to speak out for one's self.

Here's the gist of it. Walmart, and every other company in this country, functions on the concept of supply and demand. In order to do this, they are forced to operate within a system constraints or rules are imposed by our government or other regulatory agency, just like everybody else. What happens beyond that is called free market capitalism, something that this country used to reward and cherish, as long as it was done within the rules, even if it meant that your competition went out of business. Not anymore apparently. Now it's ok to compete, (but not too hard), and get big, (but not too big), and be successful, (but not too successful). Oh, and if you do get too successful or too big, then we are going to regulate you more tightly, and many people are going to try an villanize you for your growth and success.
I would argue that this change in our way of thinking is far more "left" and socialist and anti-american than anything Walmart is doing.
 
Last edited:
Premium Features