Track and Driver ???

0

01ZRTCAT

Member

Mar 12, 2010

150

20

18

• Aug 28, 2011

• #1

Hey All, Looking at tracks

Is there a 159 that is 3.0 pitch?

 

K

Killa900_1m

Free Member

Oct 14, 2010

158

12

18

42

• Aug 28, 2011

• #2

i would sack up and get a 162........:face-icon-small-ton

 

1

1Mike900

Well-known member

Premium Member

Dec 5, 2007

996

169

43

Bellevue, Wa

• Aug 28, 2011

• #3

A 162 only comes in the 3" p. A 156 x 2.5 would be the ticket if you are looking to lengthen a shorter model, more maneuverable and it will climb!

Mike

 

0

01ZRTCAT

Member

Mar 12, 2010

150

20

18

• Aug 28, 2011

• #4

Yes that is the intention, Currently has a 159 w/ rail extensions, I read that the 3.0 pitch is better? I wanted to reuse all I had except a different track.
That was why I was thinking 159?
What track is 156 3.0p

 

K

kidrman

Well-known member

Nov 21, 2007

1,183

142

63

Spokane WA

• Aug 29, 2011

• #5

The 156 is a camoplast extreme 2.5 paddle. I went from 159 to the 156 3.0 pitch and the sled is so much better is not even fair.

 

Rixster

Well-known member

Premium Member

Oct 20, 2005

3,781

651

113

47

Springville, UT

• Aug 29, 2011

• #6

If you are running a 159 right now I bet you have 2.52 drivers. You and going to have to change drivers to change to a 3.0 pitch track.

 

0

01ZRTCAT

Member

Mar 12, 2010

150

20

18

• Aug 29, 2011

• #7

Yes, changing the drivers to a 3.0 pitch, I originally thought Power Claw but only 153,

 

1

1Mike900

Well-known member

Premium Member

Dec 5, 2007

996

169

43

Bellevue, Wa

• Sep 1, 2011

• #8

and 162 is available in the PC which would be a direct replacement for the 159 besides the drivers! Also I think the 159 slide rails are a better more efficient design, maybe a little heavier but they don't crack like the KK ones! Just move the outer stiffener plates to the inside by swapping sides and shortening cross brace by .50"

Mike