Well, sort of. I had the chance to put some miles on this combination over the weekend. A little background: I HATE an aggressive ski, and much prefer a light feeling front end, even at the expense of pushing on the trail to the alpine.
SLP's Mohawks are far too aggressive for the 1100T IMHO. The tri-keel design reminds me of Simmons Gen 1's, with a bit more float - these skis will be down the road shortly.
The Skinz concept front end helps lighten the front end due to the longer wheelbase, it is more stable on the trail, and the narrower ski stance helps move the sled on it's side well, but the already narrow balance point on the PC now leaves NO room for rider error - there is a definite sweet spot that was difficult to attain in the crappy snow I rode this weekend (hero type stuff). I suspect some suspension adjustments will help, and going back to the gripper skis I was running previously. So... is the end result worth the price of admission? Honestly it is a bit early to tell - will repost once I've more time to tune & test.
SLP's Mohawks are far too aggressive for the 1100T IMHO. The tri-keel design reminds me of Simmons Gen 1's, with a bit more float - these skis will be down the road shortly.
The Skinz concept front end helps lighten the front end due to the longer wheelbase, it is more stable on the trail, and the narrower ski stance helps move the sled on it's side well, but the already narrow balance point on the PC now leaves NO room for rider error - there is a definite sweet spot that was difficult to attain in the crappy snow I rode this weekend (hero type stuff). I suspect some suspension adjustments will help, and going back to the gripper skis I was running previously. So... is the end result worth the price of admission? Honestly it is a bit early to tell - will repost once I've more time to tune & test.
