3
I'm running 12 lbs for now at 1800 ft elevation. I use around 10% race fuel and the rest 91 octane. Just a bit of a safety factor and 10% isn't a hell of a lot to keep around.
10 HP per lb of boost is theoretical. No sled will actually do it, especially at higher elevations.
Believe or not most of the time my 162" is trail ridden unless I can get to the mountains. I don't mind the track length and when you have boost it's nice to have the added traction.
If there are updates already done on the intercooler than hopefully it already has a blow off v/, AIS tubes and possibly even tabs welded on to strap it down so it doesn't pop off the boots.
10 HP per lb of boost is theoretical. No sled will actually do it, especially at higher elevations.
Believe or not most of the time my 162" is trail ridden unless I can get to the mountains. I don't mind the track length and when you have boost it's nice to have the added traction.
If there are updates already done on the intercooler than hopefully it already has a blow off v/, AIS tubes and possibly even tabs welded on to strap it down so it doesn't pop off the boots.