What is everyone running for track tension with Avid drivers?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_may_not_be_available_in_some_browsers
Just got a set of 7 tooth for the G4.. Is there any hints needed to make these bigger drivers fit
Took the G4 175 up a decent simple hill, then took up a buddy's 174 t3 to get a comparison.. To my surprise comming down hill was much quicker with the 175, so much quicker that it needed some run out where the older track I was able to stop on hill..
Only two things are different.. One is design of track and the other was the track tension.. Where the older t3 was much loser than the tight G4.
For myself and my teachings I will go loose over tight.. Till I'm proven wrong..
Don’t think the difference in chassies was the difference there, but could be wrong..
Looking tonight at the g4 in the shop I see the plastic rail stops on rails have been gouged up a fair bit and that could only be if track enertia is getting that high above rail stop.. also see that the front antistab wheels don’t look in correct position, and I have 170 thou more ware on my sliders at front compared to any other spot on sliders.. track tension and small drivers must be playing a big role in this on the few 120 miles this sled has on it
...where the new G4 is less than a inch with a 20 lb weight hanging off it..
Yes correct..
Additionally you just posted the answer to your own question.
The T3 is slower because the track is too loose.
The G4 is faster (even coasting) because the track is tighter.
For those who cut wood; look what the chain does as it stretches. All that wasted energy goes into making the chain dance, rather than just turning and cutting. If you think of the paddles like the cutting teeth on the chainsaw chain. To have the correct cutting geometry the chain has to be tensioned and straight. When it gets loose and starts doing the wave, the sharp point is missing the wood. Your paddles do the same thing on a loose track. Rather than coming straight down into the snow and grabbing / compressing the optimum amount, it gets shortchanged because the full paddle height is either oriented forward (smearing) or backward (shallow slice) depending on which side of the wave it is.
Hope that helps you visualize the fallacy that a loose track is faster, because that is completely false.