The Big Pre-Season Weigh-In

kraftymike

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Nov 27, 2007

436

153

43

Bozeman, Mt

• Oct 22, 2011

• #1

A bunch of us got together and had a pre-season weigh-in. A lot of the results surprised us. All sleds were ride ready (full of fuel, oils and coolant).

The Group

2012 Polaris 155"600, electric start/stock

2011 Polaris 155" 800 rmk stock

2009 Polaris 155" 700 rmk, can, f-bomb track mod, w.e. piggybacks

2009 Ski-Doo 154" xp 800 e start/stock

2006 Arctic Cat 153 m-7 can, venting, skid plate

2010 Arctic Cat 162 m-8 boondock turbo

2008 162" nytro mcx turbo, timbersled front and rear, lightweight seat

And the winner...



2008 Polaris 120

 

m8magicandmystery

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Jan 20, 2008

7,786

3,724

113

Yukon

• Oct 22, 2011

• #2

yikes...the nytro still a hundred more with the aftermarket skids...wow..great post thanx..

 

shelbwyo

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Jun 29, 2010

27,069

5,152

113

Sheridan, Wyo

• Oct 23, 2011

• #3

wow that nytro is a tank!!! but the 2010 ac 162 turbo kind of surprised me... but maybe we should all mod out 120's and ride them around :face-icon-small-win

 

CANNONMAN

Well-known member

Premium Member

Dec 5, 2007

1,414

1,260

113

Colorado/Wisconsin

www.thundermountainlodge.net

• Oct 23, 2011

• #4

I'm going with a 120 this year. One for each foot! Looks like a point and shoot monster, see ya at the top.

 

S

suitcase

Well-known member

Nov 9, 2008

2,409

594

113

In the great part of OR.

• Oct 23, 2011

• #5

Great post, all the sleds where real close. Well except for the yammy, LOL The one that suprised me was the 600 pro.

 

S

snowmobiler

Well-known member

Nov 26, 2001

8,107

3,922

113

• Oct 23, 2011

• #6

remove the e start and it looks like skidoo beats the rmk by 22 pounds.

 

Last edited: Oct 23, 2011

Bagger

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Nov 26, 2007

914

508

93

63

South Central WA

• Oct 23, 2011

• #7

Maybe I didn't get all this post, where's the weight for the '11 Pro 800 155?

Bag

 

L

lars53

Member

Nov 11, 2008

49

10

8

44

Belgrade MT

• Oct 23, 2011

• #8

11 rmk (not pro)552lb

 

Super A

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Dec 1, 2007

238

136

43

Belgrade Mt

• Oct 23, 2011

• #9

Lawn Ornaments

Looks like you have about $65000 in lawn ornaments, next week we need to weigh all the riders. Hopefully the scale won't need to be as big.:face-icon-small-win

 

S

Ski-Dont89

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Mar 2, 2010

749

313

63

WYOMING

• Oct 23, 2011

• #10

lmao

 

2XM3

Well-known member

Premium Member

Oct 6, 2008

3,280

1,370

113

Bitteroot valley,MT

• Oct 23, 2011

• #11

Well I guess 470 ish topped off with gas is still pretty good for my old school edge/cmx...but I love my 163 pro even if its 100 lbs more...lol

 

L

lars53

Member

Nov 11, 2008

49

10

8

44

Belgrade MT

• Oct 23, 2011

• #12

maybe I'm wrong

2XM3 said:

Well I guess 470 ish topped off with gas is still pretty good for my old school edge/cmx...but I love my 163 pro even if its 100 lbs more...lol

Click to expand...

Maybe I'm missing something here but how can you add 10 or 12 gallons of fuel to your cmx with a dry weight of 425lb, spare belt, plugs, tools, oil, ect ready to ride and be 470 ish?

 

Mafesto

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Nov 26, 2007

12,259

10,364

113

Northeast SD

• Oct 23, 2011

• #13

Good thread!

 

2XM3

Well-known member

Premium Member

Oct 6, 2008

3,280

1,370

113

Bitteroot valley,MT

• Oct 23, 2011

• #14

lars53 said:

Maybe I'm missing something here but how can you add 10 or 12 gallons of fuel to your cmx with a dry weight of 425lb, spare belt, plugs, tools, oil, ect ready to ride and be 470 ish?

Click to expand...

425 is with spare belt, and no oil, its premix.. had about 3 gallons in it at 425, tools ect go in the backpak...

holds 10 gallons btw. Every thing possible was done to save weight, carbon fiber tunnel,hood,trailing arms,all titanium bolts,titanium suspention ect...its about as light as possible....

 

Super A

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Dec 1, 2007

238

136

43

Belgrade Mt

• Oct 23, 2011

• #15

I really like the weight of that Polaris 120, but Polaris needs to step it up on that model. Trailing arms are so 1990's and I can't believe it doesn't have a two wheel kit.

A

 

J

JROD

Well-known member

Nov 6, 2004

963

223

43

39

Bozeman, MT

• Oct 23, 2011

• #16

Wish I could've been here this weekend for that. However the Salt Lake show was awesome.

 

1

1RMDave

Active member

Aug 23, 2010

111

34

28

• Oct 23, 2011

• #17

Really wish i could get mine on a scale.

 

M

maddog21

Well-known member

Mar 19, 2008

2,662

243

63

38

Charter Oak, Iowa

• Oct 23, 2011

• #18

is it 697 or 657 lbs for the yamaha? hard to see the middle number because of lighting

 

Bagger

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Nov 26, 2007

914

508

93

63

South Central WA

• Oct 23, 2011

• #19

lars53 said:

11 rmk (not pro)552lb

Click to expand...

Thank You!

maddog21 said:

is it 697 or 657 lbs for the yamaha? hard to see the middle number because of lighting

Click to expand...

Don't ya think 657 is enough? :face-icon-small-sho


Bag

 

Nytroty

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Nov 26, 2007

812

204

43

Chaska, MN

• Oct 24, 2011

• #20

m8magicandmystery said:

yikes...the nytro still a hundred more with the aftermarket skids...wow..great post thanx..

Click to expand...

100 pounds more yes. But its also double the horsepower out of everything there except that cat turbo. And i bet it walks all over that thing on a hill too. Thanks for the update guys!