2015 Pro RMK. Rumors.

LoudHandle · Dec 9, 2013

I stand corrected, my memory of the engine weight difference was way low. The last Yamaha I was close enough to touch was a triple 2S chassis. And it broke every sled dolly in my garage before I could get it out the door, and that was just the chassis, no engine. I was assuming they may have cut the fat off of them in the last ten years. Serves me right for reposting nonvalidated information.

mountainhorse · Dec 9, 2013

No worries LH... Life is good... keep the info flowing!!

.

SNWMBL · Dec 9, 2013

LoudHandle said:
Those that have transplanted the Nytro engine into the PRO chassis are well below 450 #'s. Not so much a pipe dream anymore. Still not for me, but to each their own.

I don't buy it. Show me one hanging from a scale.

Edited: Nevermind, I should have kept reading the rest of the posts. I was about to say there is no effing way.

AkLogan · Dec 9, 2013

SNWMBL said:
I don't buy it. Show me one hanging from a scale.

Edited: Nevermind, I should have kept reading the rest of the posts. I was about to say there is no effing way.

You need a link in your sig for people to see what it takes to make a 450 lb nytro.

sniffone · Dec 9, 2013

I know that the Polaris race sleds are having a hard time turning them with there new longer tracks and Ross Martin is trying new front a arms and spindle lengths on his open sleds so maybe that's where they are headed

IceCap · Dec 9, 2013

Yeah. I think new A-arms, spindles and new redesigned lighter hood (panels) heavier duty block, Fuji crank, running approx. 840 cc pumping out 11 more horsepower.

And of course BNG!!

Dizzle · Dec 9, 2013

Why do people insist on creating these types of threads?

And why do people believe, or even share, rumors that they heard from someone?

Is it a big damn race to see who can be the first person to let the cat out of the bag or something!?:argue::typing::gossip::face-icon-small-con

550iq · Dec 10, 2013

I predict the 015 sleds will be track driven, ski steered, powered by an engine transferring power via centrifugal clutches and a chaincase. As in the beginning and as in the future. Just my opinion though. 550iq

moex · Dec 10, 2013

I read somewhere there bringing back the chain case.

sledneck_03 · Dec 10, 2013

sniffone said:
I know that the Polaris race sleds are having a hard time turning them with there new longer tracks and Ross Martin is trying new front a arms and spindle lengths on his open sleds so maybe that's where they are headed

HAHA having a hard time turning 128" tracks over 121" give me a break.

800poodragon · Dec 10, 2013

:tape2::tape2::tape2:

Dizzle said:
Why do people insist on creating these types of threads?

And why do people believe, or even share, rumors that they heard from someone?

Is it a big damn race to see who can be the first person to let the cat out of the bag or something!?:argue::typing::gossip::face-icon-small-con

Boredom I think...if everybody was out riding instead we would not be getting these posts....

CROW · Dec 10, 2013

sniffone said:
I know that the Polaris race sleds are having a hard time turning them with there new longer tracks and Ross Martin is trying new front a arms and spindle lengths on his open sleds so maybe that's where they are headed

Do you watch any of the races besides Pro Open?

Hillside · Feb 6, 2014

There will be:

A 163 Assault with a Chain Case and 39" front end. You'll get the same suspension as the assault this year but 163 and narrow pro front end. I will be snowchecking one

Butta · Feb 6, 2014

Hillside said:
A 163 Assault with a Chain Case and 39" front end. You'll get the same suspension as the assault this year but 163 and narrow pro front end. I will be snowchecking one

Yeah, this would be a cool sled!!!

Hillside · Feb 6, 2014

It is

Just wait, I'm picking one up. Talked to one of the engineers and it will only be offered on snow checks this spring.

2Quickrides · Feb 6, 2014

A narrow front end Assault with a 163 and belt drive would be even better!

mountainhorse · Feb 6, 2014

Wouldn't that be a PRO RMK with piggyback shocks?

.

Hillside · Feb 6, 2014

2Quickrides said:
A narrow front end Assault with a 163 and belt drive would be even better!

Eff the Belt drive with a turbo = worthless in my opinion

assault11 · Feb 6, 2014

Hillside said:
Eff the Belt drive with a turbo = worthless in my opinion

700 miles with a boost it turbo. Not a single problem

low slung · Feb 7, 2014

http://ip.com/pat/US8499877

2015 Pro RMK. Rumors.

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Similar threads