O
It took me about 15 minutes to install them with no modifications to the skis or the rubber required.
Gripper ski design makes the PRO useless
- Thread starter akmclean
- Start date
It took me about 15 minutes to install them with no modifications to the skis or the rubber required.
As a note the 77000266's are very close to the stock dimensions and angles. I'm am going to cut one to the stock width and see if the harder durometer is enough to prevent the ski brake syndrome common with the softer stock rubbers. As a note: if this works they become half the cost as you get two out of one. Additionally saves a few ounces.
I don't know how that will work, but it is worth a try maybe. I had actually put in 2 stock ones, side by side for more surface area and they still tore. I think that maybe one big piece of rubber may hold up better.
In my opinion, the #77000266 should work much better cut down and on a solid base than the thinner #76000271 sitting on top of the two lengthwise gussets. I would think the #76000271 will shear as easy or easier than the stock rubber when mounted in this fashion. Again just my hypothesis until we see the snow and have a chance to prove / disprove our theories.
I cut the two 77000266's I got with a gripper purchase about a month ago in half and checked the fitment. They are very close to the stock dimensions, about an 1/8" shorter lengthwise and the angles are very similar. I just cut them in half width wise and then cut a small 1/8" wide pie out of each corner to clear the gusset (when the C&A's are cut in half they are about 1/4" wider than the stockers). I still shimmed the base up and back an 1/8" with a piece of HDPE I had on hand. The bolt went in too easy without the shim, IMO. I'm happy with the results, I get two bumpers out of the one C&A rubber and as a bonus I saved a few ounces.
****Note they trim very easily with a good sharp fresh razor blade.
****Note they trim very easily with a good sharp fresh razor blade.
Stiff rubbers' installation is made easier with a big C clamp and a little accessory I welded up, pretty simple and it squeezes those rubbers down and the bolt slides in great. I have since offset the V so the bolt won't interfere with the clamp as it's going in.
Do you think these will work just as well as the #76000270 ?, which is what I ordered but according to the packing slip they sent me the #266 same as you LH.
I have never had the 270's in my hand, but looking at the web pics and reading some of the previous posts. They appear to be thinner and fit on top of the gripper gussets which decreases the surface area that supports the bottom of the bumper. Which in my opinion will cause them to shear easier than the stock rubber. Again that is just my opinion from the web pics and previous posts, time will tell.
If you want to try the 270's, I'll buy your 266's. PM me for payment and my address if interested.
L
The C&A rubbers are wider and seem to be made of a stiffer material.
They are also a really tight fit against the spindle versus the grippers.
I took two guys to get the spindle seated and the bolt through. The gripper ones just flop around under the spindle.
Any news on the bad/soft Polaris rubbers or do I need a C&A rubber ?
TTT---i need to order a set of these...which part # has been working better the 266s- or 271s
As I've previously posted I use the 266's cut in half and with small 1/8" pies cut out of the 4 bottom corners to fit the ski gussets. I'll try and attach a pic here soon. I have pre-trimmed extras if you'd like to get a pair from me.
Last edited:
S
C&A
I had this problem with only 200miles on mine swapped them out for mtx C&A skis and love them even for how wide they are it really floats on the snow and side hills better then the gripper ski would highly recommend checking them out!!
I had this problem with only 200miles on mine swapped them out for mtx C&A skis and love them even for how wide they are it really floats on the snow and side hills better then the gripper ski would highly recommend checking them out!!
Similar threads
