• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

SAWS CO ACTION ALERT: San Juan Public Lands DLMP and DEIS - SW Colorado

SAWS CO ACTION ALERT:

San Juan Public Lands (FS and BLM) Draft Land Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement – Southwestern Colorado

Comment Deadline: March 12, 2008


Comments on the Proposed San Juan Land Management may be submitted through the following means (at this time SAWS has not been able to obtain a valid email address to submit your comments, but the website link below does allow you the option to attach a formatted email response):


Via Website at: http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/forestPlan/comments_07/comments.asp
By FAX to: 916-456-6724
By mail to:

San Juan Plan Revision
P.O. Box 162909
Sacramento, CA 95816-2909​


Reference information: http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/forestplan/DEIS/tocMain.asp


This is a very important SAWS Action Alert for snowmobilers who come to Southwest Colorado to snowmobile on San Juan Public Lands. The Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management are updating the Land Management Plan. The final results of this plan could have a very adverse affect on the areas where snowmobilers will be allowed to recreate in the not too distant future. Snowmobilers need to stand up for their rights to recreate on these public lands.

SAWS strongly encourages you to send a detailed comment letter indicating that you support Alternative A (No action) and explain why you support this alternative. Alternative A would leave all currently allowed riding areas open. Snowmobilers will lose nearly 500,000* acres currently open to snowmobile use if Alternative B (the preferred alternative) is implemented. That is a reduction of 481,985 acres open to snowmobile use or more than 36%.

*This figure is based on 1,329,159 acres open to Over-Snow use versus 847,174 acres open to Over-Snow use in the preferred alternative B.

SAWS is requesting that you not only submit a comment letter on this DLMP and DEIS, but that you also reply to this email and provide SAWS with detailed information on the areas that you ride that must remain open.

Here is a link that explains in detail the differences between the four provided alternatives and explains what will remain open to Over-Snow travel with each alternative:

http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/forestPlan/DEIS/pdf/Vol1 Ch2 ALTERNATIVES.pdf

Note: Alt A Over-Snow map can be found on page 26 in the above link. Alt B Over-Snow map is on page 31. Alt C Over-Snow map is on page 36. Alt D Over-Snow map is on page 41.

SAWS does not support any of the proposed closures, but we need specific detailed information from our members who recreate on these public lands so that we can send out an updated alert in February to ALL of our SAWS members across the western United States with more detailed information to allow snowmobilers to provides comments that are not familiar with this area. Just stating that you support Alternative A will not be enough without providing more detailed information and the reasons why you feel these areas need to remain open.

Contact your friends and riding partners and attend one of the meetings described below this alert. I have attended several previous meetings in the early scoping stages of this planning process. The San Juan Citizens Alliance (anti-snowmobilers) have shown up at the previous meetings in large numbers. We must make our concerns be known or we will have to live with the end results.

Thank you all for your interest in and dedication to protecting YOUR right to ride.

William

Snowmobile Alliance of Western States

Protecting the right to ride for the owners of 303,604 registered snowmobiles (2005) in the western United States.

Copyright © 2007 Snowmobile Alliance of Western States. All Rights Reserved.

Permission is granted to distribute this information in whole or in part, as long as Snowmobile Alliance of Western States (SAWS) is acknowledged as the source. If you are not yet a member of SAWS and you would like receive these alerts, please sign up on our web site at: http://www.snowmobile-alliance.org/

2008 Public Meeting Schedule
http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/forestplan/2008_publicMeetings.asp

During the comment period we will hold public meetings to assist the people with understanding the documents and submitting comments. Continuing with the Community Study Group meeting format that was used in 2005-06, public meetings will be held at the following locations and dates:

January 16th, 2008 Cortez Holiday Inn/Koko's Conference Center
6:30* - 8:30 pm 2121 East Main
Cortez, Colorado

January 23, 2008 Durango Community Recreation Center
6:30* - 8:30 pm 2700 Main Avenue
Durango, Colorado

January 29, 2008 Pagosa Springs Community Center
6:30* - 8:30 pm 451 Hot Springs Blvd.
Pagosa Springs, Colorado

January 31, 2008 Silverton Town Hall
6:30* - 8:30 pm 1360 Greene Street
Silverton, Colorado

February 6, 2008 Rico Town Hall
6:30* - 8:30 pm 2 North Commercial
Rico, Colorado

Community Study Group members and all interested publics are encouraged to attend one of the meetings. The content at each meeting will include:

A review of the organization of the documents to help readers navigate them;
Information about how to give comment; and
Discussion about how the 2005-06 Study Group meetings (and overall public scoping comments) have been used to shape the DEIS alternatives and plan direction.
In addition to the above information, each meeting will be tailored to focus on the San Juan Public Lands most closely associated with each community (e.g., the Cortez meeting will be tailored to focus on the direction related to the Dolores).
 
Say goodbye to this area!

From the lack of replies and views to this thread in the last two months, I guess the 500,000 acres that could be closed to snowmobilers in SW Colorado, doesn't have any areas that people on this forum snowmobile in.

Oh well, guess we can add this to another area soon closed due to lack of snowmobiler initiative to get involved until after it is closed, which is always too late. :confused:
 
http://ocs.fortlewis.edu/forestPlan/DEIS/pdf/Vol1 Ch2 ALTERNATIVES.pdf

P 71

481, 985 acres closed to snowmobile use in proposed "preferred" Alternative B.

attachment.php


You need to support Alternative A (No Action)!

San Juan Public Lands - Suitable Lands - Snow.jpg
 
Last edited:
B

Bull

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2004
776
106
43
colorado
letter sent......keyboard is still smoking. can't escape the feeling of peeing into a shop fan. F*CK. they are going to need a large assault force to keep us from riding around south fork.
 
S
Sep 10, 2005
427
109
43
Grand Junction, CO
Letter sent.

Your tax dollars at work.

They won't be happy until they close every last acre of "public" land.

They are going to "protect" the land for future generations so your kids won't have anyplace to ride either.
 
B

bdubs

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
999
165
43
80204
TTT even if you don't ride here or in colorado period, drop a line in support!! Thanks!!
 
O
Dec 6, 2007
857
495
63
Hey guys, this is my backyard and we ARE fighting it, fighting it hard. The meeting in Silverton was postponed due to weather but we had it last Tuesday. Sledders were there in force. The land managers were visibly squirming in their boots as the questions were asked of them. The manager in charge of the recreation part of the plan, a Mr. Dave Baker from the Delores office is a ski nazi. He did not do his duty to involve motorized users during the draft work up. He is not even well liked among his peers. I feel like we still have a shot at this one.

First, if you want to make comments, we need to support alternative D. It still has obnoxious amounts of closure however, those closures have very minimal impact on snowmobiles. Alternative B hits hard in two areas near and dear to snowmobilers, the Red Mountain Pass area needs special mention. The area known as US Basin is a great place for sledding, we even bring families up in there. That is rare as there are no groomed trails and the terrain is fairly extreme. The other area in need of special mention in your letters is the Molas Pass area. Long established as a snowmobile haven. There is a large network of grooming and tons of accessible back country from it. The want to steal that from us as well. It will likely mean the loss of the snowmobile tour business based there.

I have the Colorado Snowmobile Associations draft comment (in draft form) in a word doc if any of you would like to read through it and submit more informed comments on the area. PM me, I would be happy to email it too you.

Just another travesty in the making guys. If you really want to comment, drop me a PM, the CSA comment will give you some ammo. We need to specificallly mention the Red Mtn ans Molas areas in the comments and support alternative D. Alternative A would be nice but we all know they do not do 6 years of work to keep the status quo.

Just wanted you to know, we are fighting back. We have another winter travel meeting coming up, and have soem solid arguments and proposals to keep the land we use open. Thanks for your support:)

Brent Holm
Pres. Ridgway Ridgrunners Snowmobile Club
 
Premium Features