T
So I got a chance to get a good ride in on my new 175. We rode some full tilt technical ground. Steep steep trees where there is very little room for error or to cover deficiency in the sled.
The 850 175 proved to be an animal in this terrain! With the one exception of its washout tendency. It is worse than my 174 t3 I'm coming from at just losing the reared down the hill. I can be in perfect control, going fast or slow and at a certain point of steepness the rear end start creeping lower and lower until it spins you straight uphill and its over. We had a 165 850 with us that has Toms setup under it. I have never seen a shorter version of the same chassis washout less until now.
Whats up with the 175 setup making it wash? Did Doo sit the skid in the chassis slightly different to make it handle easier and its having the negative effect of washout in the real steep stuff?
Up until basically the steepest stuff you will typically ever ride, the 175 is phenomenal in all ways.
Any insight?
The 850 175 proved to be an animal in this terrain! With the one exception of its washout tendency. It is worse than my 174 t3 I'm coming from at just losing the reared down the hill. I can be in perfect control, going fast or slow and at a certain point of steepness the rear end start creeping lower and lower until it spins you straight uphill and its over. We had a 165 850 with us that has Toms setup under it. I have never seen a shorter version of the same chassis washout less until now.
Whats up with the 175 setup making it wash? Did Doo sit the skid in the chassis slightly different to make it handle easier and its having the negative effect of washout in the real steep stuff?
Up until basically the steepest stuff you will typically ever ride, the 175 is phenomenal in all ways.
Any insight?