• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

15 years of Snowfall Graphs in Island Park/West Yellowstone (peaks)

christopher

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 1, 2008
81,516
27,375
113
Rigby, Idaho
I was doing a little research this morning to see what we have left of our season for Island Park. So I went through the last 10 years of SnoTel data and compiled some charts. These are for the Island Park Black Bear sensor, so this would be the HIGHEST readings for all of Island Park.

Each screen is Auto-Sized for itself, so the peaks are NOT relative to each other, each chart can represent a SIGNIFICANTLY different amount of snow from one year to another!

But the 10 year pattern does show some predictability on peak snow and when the big melt-off comes.
 

christopher

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 1, 2008
81,516
27,375
113
Rigby, Idaho
2001 Snowfall

Max = 88 Inches
Melt arrived on April 20th

plot

 

christopher

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 1, 2008
81,516
27,375
113
Rigby, Idaho
2012
Max = 143 Inches
Melt arrived on May 7th

plot



2013
Max = 102 Inches
Melt arrived on April 26th

plot


2014

Max = 135 Inches
Melt arrived on May 13th

plot



2015
Max = 100 Inches
Melt arrived on April 1st

plot
 
Last edited:
D
Dec 7, 2007
30
13
8
2010 Snowfall (so far)

Max = 95 Inches
Melt arrived on ????

plot


I'm confused. This graph shows the snowfall to be substantially less than prior years? Am I reading something wrong? It also appears to be a prediction line as we are only in January.

On another note, the previous years of 2006 and 2008 show substantially more snowfall in January than what is currently listed for this January (95in now). To me this wouldn't justify saying "MIGHT be a Historic year for snow" when looking at the past data. Just an observation, not bashing, just observing.
 
A

acutah

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2007
646
289
63
Kaysville, UT
I'm confused. This graph shows the snowfall to be substantially less than prior years? Am I reading something wrong? It also appears to be a prediction line as we are only in January.

On another note, the previous years of 2006 and 2008 show substantially more snowfall in January than what is currently listed for this January (95in now). To me this wouldn't justify saying "MIGHT be a Historic year for snow" when looking at the past data. Just an observation, not bashing, just observing.


I think you are observing last year. This year would be the 2011 Graph which has not been shown.
 
D
Dec 7, 2007
30
13
8
I think you are observing last year. This year would be the 2011 Graph which has not been shown.

That's what I was thinking...but then after the 2010, there is a parenthesis (so far) which to me would indicate that it is for this year. Then to add to it, the melt date has 3 question marks.

Oh well, I'm not in the states to enjoy the snow anyway so I'm just passing time by here.
 
Last edited:

christopher

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 1, 2008
81,516
27,375
113
Rigby, Idaho
These graphs are semi-automatic.
When I created that one last season it had NOT yet run the whole season.
So as the year progressed, so did the graph.
 

christopher

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 1, 2008
81,516
27,375
113
Rigby, Idaho
This is the graph for this year to date.


#6. ISLAND PARK "MOUNTAINS"
SNOTEL Site: Black Bear
State: Montana
Site Number: 347
County: Gallatin
Latitude: 44 deg; 30 min N
Longitude: 111 deg; 8 min W
Elevation: 8170 feet
plot
 
Premium Features