Well this is a laughable statement. I used to ride a turbo Yamaha and this is nothing like it. They are heavy!! The couple of extra pounds difference on the Polaris and Doo is not even worth mentioning when you are riding them.
not impressed with the 2017 so far.
- Thread starter logan1080
- Start date
Well this is a laughable statement. I used to ride a turbo Yamaha and this is nothing like it. They are heavy!! The couple of extra pounds difference on the Polaris and Doo is not even worth mentioning when you are riding them.
F
im thinking you don't see to many mxz in mountarous regions, and most in the eastern trail systems, cross country racing.. Low elevation riding.. Would be my popular guess
More than anything it's what your use too and what you like.. Between the tra and shockwave helix it's been pretty tuneable..
More than anything it's what your use too and what you like.. Between the tra and shockwave helix it's been pretty tuneable..
I don't think anyone said other clutches aren't adjustable. Just that the clickers allow you a relatively quick means for a fine adjustment of the RPMs. No more no less. Let it go.
D
Actually in the spring time when the snow is hard riding short tracks is a blast in fact more fun than a long track and way faster track speeds.
DPG
True story.
We can all agree this is pretty sweet?
As for torque #'s should be 111 - 112 just based off cu. in
at 50.83. Or based off peak power at 7900 would be 109.69, but usually torque peaks 200 rpm below peak HP. The question is how are they controlling the powervalves electronically, smooth even opening or in stages? I bet this engine will make more than the advertised 165 and be closer to 171. Nice thing with the crank is you can have aftermarket rods for turbo applications. Or how about titanium rods and remove some of the counterbalance weights that are bolted to the throws. Just think a 86mm piston and you have a 955cc torque monster that can spool up super fast!
Mike
at 50.83. Or based off peak power at 7900 would be 109.69, but usually torque peaks 200 rpm below peak HP. The question is how are they controlling the powervalves electronically, smooth even opening or in stages? I bet this engine will make more than the advertised 165 and be closer to 171. Nice thing with the crank is you can have aftermarket rods for turbo applications. Or how about titanium rods and remove some of the counterbalance weights that are bolted to the throws. Just think a 86mm piston and you have a 955cc torque monster that can spool up super fast!
Mike
N
2017
This sled is a big improvement for ski doo. I ride 16 axys and pump gas turbo and I was impressed with it. I've got time on a XM too and I hate it. The new doo rides well and has great power. It will dominate any stock sled on market in power. Handling my axys wins all day bc of how nimble it is. If I was climbing up and down the doo is a monster. The doo is getting nimble and with that power if they keep it up I consider trading up to a doo again. It will take a diet for the doo and some good side hill ability to change me the rest is close though. Btw I love my axys
This sled is a big improvement for ski doo. I ride 16 axys and pump gas turbo and I was impressed with it. I've got time on a XM too and I hate it. The new doo rides well and has great power. It will dominate any stock sled on market in power. Handling my axys wins all day bc of how nimble it is. If I was climbing up and down the doo is a monster. The doo is getting nimble and with that power if they keep it up I consider trading up to a doo again. It will take a diet for the doo and some good side hill ability to change me the rest is close though. Btw I love my axys
Similar threads
