In theory yes... to some degree Milehigh... but in these applications... where you are adding over 100hp in most cases... the difference in any kind of efficiency is not there.
Show me a reciprocating engine, especially with ones that have as wildly varying throttle/load demands, that does not need a good cooling system.
Burn more fuel...make more HP... make more heat, unless you are changing the frictional properties of the engines.
Mod and Turbo engines burn more fuel.... make more heat.... ESPECIALLY when we are talking about the the same engine, without any internal mods to them (bolt the turbo kit on and go)
In my 25 yrs experience with big marine diesel motors... a Ti motor always had a much larger cooling system than its N.A. brethren.
I believe that diesel motors (compression ignition motors) take longer to warm up because of different factors like lower heat content of the fuel and the character of the combustion process.... the non turbo motors seem to take the same time as the turbo diesels to warm up.
I see where you are coming from and I love to play devils advocate as well, but in this case, IMO, splitting hairs.
Bottom Line is that the new PRO Chassis RMK"s have a significantly smaller capacity cooling system when compared to the previous years ... with the same engine/output. The engineers saw a surplus of capacity before and pared it down to a comfortable minimum to drop weight.
Will it be enough for a stock system... I have no doubts, for one that makes 100+ more hp like a turbo can... HMMM...
The turbo will void the warranty anyway.... having extra cooling is good measure IMO.
I guess I should have been more precise
Basic physics.. more HP = more heat... from the same motor