https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=_2D8Kay99kc
A bunch of us snow and mud members got together, and weighted the 19’s these sleds were full of fuel and iil ready to ride. They all had their stock cans, I was there and witnessed the weights.
Very good! Cause now to get the weights of the other models for each brand. We just have to look at the differences in dry weight and subtract that difference from the wet weights in this video! Awesome stuff, thanks for sharing.
It seems as if we have all (even non-Doo riders) come to agree that the Doo is the easiest to ride. Strictly referring to stock setups. It
is not the easiest to side-hill but
it is the easiest to get there.
It is the easiest on your body all day. Once you get the Poo or the Cat on one ski it is better which is why some people might say they are easier to ride, but there is a difference between "easiest to ride" and "easiest to ride on edge". They are easier to sidehill once on edge but not by that great of a margin. This is why we see a good mix of all brands on the mountain.
There are people who prefer the technical riding to be easier. There are people who want riding to be easier throughout the whole day. And there are people who like all the tidbits that come on a Ski-doo (Shot, fit and finish, e-tec technology, ect.). Then you throw in longevity of parts and the Doo is tough to compete with quality wise. They are the Mercedes-Benz in terms of overall product. I think we see where each company aims their product. Ski-doo simply wants easier. Cat and Doo want technical.
Can't go wrong with Doo when trying to go technical but maybe just not ideal in comparison. OF COURSE when you start modifying the stocks machines you can get them to do whatever. That type of stuff is better left out of the conversation because it induces more variables. When going away from stock you can start getting Poo and Cats to cross over into "easier all day" and you can start getting Doos to cross over into "better for technical riding" but each is a trade-off