• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

>>> SAWS calls it Quits after 10 years!

christopher

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 1, 2008
81,519
27,381
113
Rigby, Idaho
Snowmobile Alliance of Western States

Cutting through deceptions & misperceptions to protect YOUR RIGHT to ride!

SAWSSpolight.jpg


[FONT=&quot]

[FONT=&quot]SAWS News:
After 10 years of fighting for snowmobiler
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]access – SAWS says goodbye[/FONT]



http://www.snowmobile-alliance.org/


[FONT=&quot]SAWS would like to thank all of you that became members of SAWS to support snowmobilers’ right to ride. We are extremely humbled by the number of snowmobilers that supported our effort. Thank you so much. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]That said; it is with great sadness that the SAWS volunteers have unanimously voted to say goodbye and disband the organization effective September 1, 2014 - which also just happens to be our 10-year anniversary.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]When SAWS was launched in the summer of 2004, we had grand ideas of what could be accomplished with enough assistance from snowmobilers. Nothing like SAWS had ever been done before in the snowmobiling community – a multi-state, pro-snowmobile access organization wiith ZERO membership fees and an all-volunteer staff. We felt with free membership, there would be no reason not to join SAWS. We had also expected to easily find dozens of volunteers in multiple states.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]One of the primary reasons we formed SAWS was to make information easy to find regarding potential closures to snowmobiling areas. Our volunteer staff researched the information, deciphered it, and delivered a meaningful message with clear action items that was intended toengage snowmobilers in the process. Given the vast amount of information available from well-funded, anti-motorized organizations such as Winter Wildlands Alliance, the Wilderness Society and many more localized groups, it seemed realistic that a similar model for communication should work for snowmobilers. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]SAWS was very successful in achieving a large membership. We have over 4,000 members, made up of individuals, clubs, organizations and [/FONT][FONT=&quot]associations from across the country. If we were to include the individual members of all of our member groups, SAWS probably has tenfold the 4,000 members that receive our information. It is impossible to count how many non-member snowmobilers gain valuable information from our website. On this front we were enormously successful.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Our position from the beginning was to be the ONLY snowmobile organization that would take the firm position of NO MORE WILDERNESSâ€, as we felt the existing 104.5 million acres at that time (2004) was plenty. Unfortunately, there are now 109.5 million acres of wilderness in the US. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]SAWS was never an organization that cared to only protect snowmobile use on groomed trails. We believed the majority of our members were more into backcountry off-trail riding – although access to the backkcountry riding area by means of groomed trails was also important.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Some existing organizations were always willing to give up some riding areas here, if the anti-snowmobile groups would agree to let them keep a small riding spot over there. We didn’t fall for that rouse. The opposition would always come back for more and more after agreements were penned. Obviously, this is ultimately a losing position, as 50%, of 50%, of 50% of snowmobile riding areas lost would eventually result in only a few small areas left open to legally ride. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]SAWS supported Webster's definition of a compromise. That is; "a settlement in which each side makes concessions". We never believed in coming to the table to discuss how much we were willing to give up. Instead, we believed the discussions needed to start from the standpoint of what new areas our opposition was willing to open for snowmobilers, in exchange for closing non-preferred areas currently open to snowmobilers. But when have you ever seen the anti-snowmobile groups willing to compromise on much of anything?[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Our SAWS Mission was to “provide education regarding public lands policy and outdoor recreation ethics in order to preserve and protect access to traditional trails and terrain on public lands, so that future generations will be able to enjoy nature through snowmobiling as generations have done in the pastâ€. We certainly achieved the “education†portion of our mission statement.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Why did SAWS finally come to the decision to disband? Our number one reason was the lack of volunteer assistance. The majority of our current staff have volunteered for SAWS since the very beginning, which was just over ten years ago. All of our volunteers, past and present, have put in numerous hours - too many hours to even try and count. Hours spent at the computer researching issues; writing and communicating news and alerts to our members; writing and responding to articles in numerous publications; attending meetings, rallies, and conferences. Many of us have missed too many days riding fresh powder; only because there [/FONT][FONT=&quot]was a time-critical issue that needed to be researched. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]SAWS volunteers have also been on the receiving end of some negative comments from time to time; particularly from those against our cause and efforts for snowmobilers right to ride on public land. But we brushed them off and kept up the good fight. All this effort over the last decade was also without a single dime of compensation for our time, as all donations to SAWS were and will be in the near future donated to the efforts and lawsuits to keep snowmobiling riding areas open. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]But quite frankly, we are burned out and have other life events that need to be addressed and interests we would like to have the time to enjoy. We have also lacked the kind of support needed from industry companies and partners that would have helped keep this energy strong and growing. So we feel it is now time for us to move on.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]As we have always promised, our members personal [/FONT][FONT=&quot]information, including email and/or physical addresses, will always remain private and not be shared outside our organization. In keeping with that promise, we will purge all member information from our systems on September 1, 2014.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]SAWS will also be donating our remaining funds to the following worthy organizations in (alphabetical order):[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]o [/FONT][FONT=&quot]BlueRibbon Coalition[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]o [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Citizens For Balanced Use[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]o [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Forest Access for All[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]o [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Idaho Recreation Council[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]o [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Idaho State Snowmobile Assoc Legal Fund[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]o [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Washington State Snowmobile Assoc Legal Action Fund

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]These are all organizations that SAWS has worked with on potential closure issues in the past, and we know the funds previously donated to SAWS by our members will be put to positive use by these organizations in the future to support snowmobiler access to public lands.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]We will most certainly see some of you on the mountain in the future. Ride hard, or go home.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Sincerely,[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]SAWS Volunteer Staff;[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Scott Chapman[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Dave Hurwitz[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]John Jones[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Susie Rainsberry[/FONT]

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Mindy Walker[/FONT][/SIZE]
 
Last edited:
J

Jorli

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2009
425
768
93
www.highmarkfilms.com
No industry support.....consistent theme for sure! The money only goes one way in this business. When will the industry realize that those that make great efforts to support their business need reciprocal energy to survive? Probably never. It really makes one wonder whether the big 4 actually care about the sport or just profit. Brutal.

Thank you for all the hard work!!!
 

Sled Idaho

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 14, 2002
425
141
43
58
McCall, Idaho
www.snowmobile-alliance.org
No industry support.....consistent theme for sure! The money only goes one way in this business. When will the industry realize that those that make great efforts to support their business need reciprocal energy to survive? Probably never. It really makes one wonder whether the big 4 actually care about the sport or just profit. Brutal.

Thank you for all the hard work!!!

If you look at nation-wide snowmobile registrations, the mountain/western states make up about 10%. There is where the mountain segment lies. When you back away and take the emotion out of it (extremely hard to do btw) it makes sense that the Big Four, ACSA, IMSA, etc., don't do a lot to support the cause that SAWS worked towards.

Your best bet is to join and support your local clubs and state association. The list of recipients noted in the letter above are all very good at working on our behalf. I would encourage everyone to support some of these or to find out who is fighting on your behalf locally and support them.
 
J

Jorli

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2009
425
768
93
www.highmarkfilms.com
If you look at nation-wide snowmobile registrations, the mountain/western states make up about 10%. There is where the mountain segment lies. When you back away and take the emotion out of it (extremely hard to do btw) it makes sense that the Big Four, ACSA, IMSA, etc., don't do a lot to support the cause that SAWS worked towards.

Your best bet is to join and support your local clubs and state association. The list of recipients noted in the letter above are all very good at working on our behalf. I would encourage everyone to support some of these or to find out who is fighting on your behalf locally and support them.

I believe its closer to 25% in Western states, however I'm Canadian. Just rings true with dealings with the industry.
 

Pro-8250

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Mar 4, 2008
4,028
1,637
113
Northern MN.
No industry support.....consistent theme for sure! The money only goes one way in this business. When will the industry realize that those that make great efforts to support their business need reciprocal energy to survive? Probably never. It really makes one wonder whether the big 4 actually care about the sport or just profit. Brutal.

Thank you for all the hard work!!!


I would say profit is number one in any business. I can't speak for the western states but, Polaris and Arctic Cat are very much involved inside and outside the snowmobiling industry.

http://webmn.alsa.org/site/TR?fr_id=10520&pg=entry
 

mountainhorse

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Dec 12, 2005
18,606
11,814
113
West Coast
www.laketahoeconcours.com
Sad day indeed... but not surprising.

I've watched at Snow Shows as people, mountain sledders, walk right by the SAWS booth with their $5 beer in hand and a crappy $7 burrito ...
and not drop a red cent to contribute to the "cause".

I also agree with Jorli that the Business and Industry contributions to organizations like SAWS is/has-been, for the most part, apathetic.

I'm proud that I have been a consistent contributor to SAWS, and will continue to be with other organizations out there.






.
 
Last edited:
J

Jorli

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2009
425
768
93
www.highmarkfilms.com
As it was pointed out in the press release and has mentioned in other forum threads, the various wilderness coalitions that work to have snowmobiling shutdown receive a tremendous amount of support from industry affiliates, that certainly must help to provide them with some energy to pursue their agenda. If those that profit the most in our industry will not stick up for it, then it is a lost cause. I really don't understand the apathy.
 

christopher

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 1, 2008
81,519
27,381
113
Rigby, Idaho
As it was pointed out in the press release and has mentioned in other forum threads, the various wilderness coalitions that work to have snowmobiling shutdown receive a tremendous amount of support from industry affiliates, that certainly must help to provide them with some energy to pursue their agenda. If those that profit the most in our industry will not stick up for it, then it is a lost cause. I really don't understand the apathy.
The apathy comes from NOT looking beyond our own little backyard riding spot.

Sledders are entirely TOO independent and NOT "Community" minded.
Until "WE" get to the point where we value EVERY square acre of riding space, REGARDLESS of whether or not is it where WE ride on weekends, we will not begin to win the battle.

I have posted many land issue updates here on SnoWest over the years.
They all fall on DEAF EARS.
The members simply are NOT INTERESTED unless it is there own specific riding area that is being threatened.
 

Sled Idaho

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 14, 2002
425
141
43
58
McCall, Idaho
www.snowmobile-alliance.org
O
Dec 6, 2007
857
495
63
Sad, but hardly surprising. I once spent a decade of my life dedicated to "the cause". I started a club where there was none, collaborated directly with the state clubs Pres and vp, met repeatedly with the USFS and BLM managers, reasearched, photographed, mapped, commented, wrote to the paper almost weekly, met with local anti groups repeatedly, and on and on and on.

It is an impossible uphill battle against an adversary many times our size. Witness the continued loss of rights in the face of all the opposition we can muster.

I gave up too. Club members were more interested in drinking beer than solving problems. Now we have a proposed wilderness expansion that I can see from my house in town. Still nobody seems to care.

This is the same kind of thing that drove my buddy out of a 20 year long career as a logger in Oregon. Rules, regs, closures all under the guise of "protecting" our lands.

So far, we remain pretty fortunate where I live. Lots to ride, not many people riding.
 
G

geo

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2007
2,170
2,336
113
68
Kamloops B.C.
I respect the volunteers of SAWS an admire the decade of effort. Having personally been involved (as a volunteer) (for too long also) fighting land use issues for motorsports, IMO the business model of SAWS was flawed from the beginning.



A little history. Land use issues for those that like to turn, flip or push a throttle have been around since I first pushed my dirt bike up the street to the edge of town. Whether it is a small bike track at the edge of town or a small unique flower in remote location that's under 20' of snow when your're there, the issue is always about lifestyles in the end. You like motors or you don't.

This is how you need to tackle your agenda at the round table and fight fire with fire.



Volunteer is a thing from the 70's. Everyone else at this level is a paid employee or lobbyist. The posey sniffer groups have been organized this way for decades. Their agenda is very clear internally (but they also are well versed in political correctness and clique wording) and they come equipped with the proper tools.
They like days of nothing accomplished because volunteers eventually disappear. Maybe not for this battle but usually before the end of the war.

Proper tools? Numbers and dollars with a "spattering" of scientific fact to fill the discussion of the day.

If you have an "undisputed" scientific fact, it is like an ace in the hole and a good "poker player" can win this battle but numbers and dollars wins the war. It's a lot of research and effort to come up with and prove an "undisputed" scientific fact for each battle.

Kinda simplified but the representatives of the manufacturers, government, and even local commercial enterprises side with numbers and dollars because it speaks to them (their language) in the same terms as their bosses and their agenda.

Their battle here is to gain sales, votes and future income.

That leaves just those that like motors and those that don't to battle for a consensus. Motor lovers have never really got together to help their cause. I remember fighting ATVer's for motorcycle use lol. I still shake my head in disbelief.


If you have 4000 members (not a big #) but if it represents 40,000 sledders, then you multiply that by 5 to include ma, pa, 2 kids and the dog and you come closer to the same math used by other users involved.

With those numbers in hand you hire money committee (that enjoys this stuff) to "attack" everyone involved for donations and grants as well as hire a membership committee (who can use "paid" volunteers) to just go out and get signatures to get the money committee more numbers and thus more money.

After you are well funded at this level you hire "political" committee to lobby the other "motor lovers" to set aside their differences and look at the bigger picture and support each other and combine numbers and dollars.

That number would bring huge influence to land use co-ordinate resource management committees.

When your rich enough you can buy a ship or two and make international headlines and have international stars join in to get more numbers and money while your saving the,,,.

Oops wrong user group lol



We are so far (world-wise) behind it may be almost irreversible. This may not be understood by peeps from the more metropolitan parts of the country but I feel lucky up here that free-riding is still around in places. 45min. from home and I'm on the snow and grinning. I like that and is one of the reasons I live where I do but I hear they may ask me to plate my sled soon lol.

That is an attempt to put numbers and dollars together up here so I'll pay my fee for that reason but will continue to follow the loggers (really well paid lobbyists lol). After they finish "cleaning up" the mountain and move out, we ride until the new growth comes in. Then simply move on.

I really only have another decade to worry about though lol.
 

line8

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 20, 2008
1,556
532
113
West of East
Here's another thought. You go to REI and buy something. You go buy a Subaru. You go to Costco. I can go on and on, portions of those dollars go to the cause of importance to those organizations. As times goes on piles of dollars add up in an effort for the or other organizations they believe in. I don't see much of that in any of the purchases I make specific to snowmobiling.
 
Premium Features