Another track option?

H

himark1

New member

Nov 29, 2007

29

2

3

gods country

• Oct 28, 2017

• #1

So i need a new track since 2.6 is toast, i was thinking about running a 3.2 cut down to 3" since the x3 is heavier than the 3.2
Because its fully clipped. Ive searched and cant find anyone whos done this. Or i might just do the 2.8 camso and hope it breaks in fast. What driver set up is everyone running (beltdrive), can i just run non-extroverts and not cut the rails or should i go with the sprockets? :face-icon-small-con

 

G

gonehuntnpowder

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Nov 27, 2008

1,033

566

113

59

Eastern Idaho

• Oct 28, 2017

• #2

I put the extrovert drivers on mine. It has a 174 3 inch polaris on it, but if I had it to do over again I would run the 3.2 camoplast. I went with the Tki belt drive. Mine was born a 163 2.6

 

richracer1

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Feb 2, 2011

3,626

2,480

113

Idaho Falls, ID

• Oct 28, 2017

• #3

I have the 3.2 on mine and I fully clipped it due to using SLP's Hyperfax. It works great, I wouldn't cut it down.

As for drivers, get the Avid 3" drivers for your driveshaft. Avid makes drivers that utilized the center windows like stock, but I prefer the extroverts on the clipped windows.

 

H

himark1

New member

Nov 29, 2007

29

2

3

gods country

• Oct 28, 2017

• #4

Ok right on, and obviously i would need to run a antistab kit right?

 

S

Sheetmetalfab

Well-known member

Lifetime Membership

Oct 5, 2010

7,908

6,650

113

……..

• Oct 28, 2017

• #5

himark1 said:

So i need a new track since 2.6 is toast, i was thinking about running a 3.2 cut down to 3" since the x3 is heavier than the 3.2
Because its fully clipped. Ive searched and cant find anyone whos done this. Or i might just do the 2.8 camso and hope it breaks in fast. What driver set up is everyone running (beltdrive), can i just run non-extroverts and not cut the rails or should i go with the sprockets? :face-icon-small-con

Click to expand...

Just buy the 3.2 and run it as is.

Why cut it?

They work very good.

 

H

himark1

New member

Nov 29, 2007

29

2

3

gods country

• Oct 29, 2017

• #6

I was just trying keep some clearance and weight down as the 3.2 is pretty light. Really leaning towards the 2.8 since 80% of the time its not dry fluff where i hear this track trenches more than a x3.