• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

154, 165, or 175?

Which length?

  • 154

    Votes: 115 25.8%
  • 165

    Votes: 215 48.3%
  • 175

    Votes: 115 25.8%

  • Total voters
    445

cubby

Well-known member
Premium Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,208
499
83
I voted 154" just for the fact that where and who I ride with would never use the full extent of a sled longer then 165". All my 154" have taken me every where I have needed to go.
 
L

logan1080

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2013
263
80
28
I voted 154" just for the fact that where and who I ride with would never use the full extent of a sled longer then 165". All my 154" have taken me every where I have needed to go.

Yeah I spent a lot of days last season with the shovel out in the mountains with the 154". It went lots of places but in the waist deep light powder it's not hard to get stuck!
 

yosh30

Active member
Lifetime Membership
Aug 16, 2009
235
33
28
If you ask me why not go with a 165 and get the best of both worlds. 75% of the time With my 165 all I need is a ski pull to get unstuck:face-icon-small-hap
 
Last edited:

Jblaze74

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 20, 2011
263
60
28
Reno/North Tahoe
I went 165. I"m 6'6" 300#s and my 163xm has been great. Most would say go 175 for my size, but the sierra cement we have here, it's overkill.... I think that touch extra length and 3" lugs will be plenty...
 

Wheel House Motorsports

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
29,933
5,968
113
34
SW MT
154 ALL day. The new tracks hook up so well anything longer seriously takes the fun out of it. You can still do things on a 154 3" that would have taken a turbo a few years ago.

Also makes it a lot easier to whip around and jump with.
 
F
Oct 13, 2013
48
16
8
41
The deciding factor for me (6'4" close to 300# with gear) was the seriously deep days. I frequent the revy area when I do ride. Those nipple deep days are too fun for this guy to be digging all dam day. Every time I update the rubber keeps getting longer and deeper. Started out with a 136 1.5" in my lighter days, now awaiting a 165 3" had fun on them all
 

Nytroty

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
812
204
43
Chaska, MN
154 ALL day. The new tracks hook up so well anything longer seriously takes the fun out of it. You can still do things on a 154 3" that would have taken a turbo a few years ago.

Also makes it a lot easier to whip around and jump with.

How much do you Weigh? That makes a big difference on how much fun a 154 is to ride...
 

rulonjj

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 15, 2008
1,730
1,088
113
capitol town, WY
I had a 154 Xm for 3 years. Rode a 165x3 last year and this year I'm back on a 154. The 165 was a tractor. It just keeps going and going but it's not as fun. The 154 is a lot more nimble whenever you are trying to whip the front around. I weigh 175lbs.
 
L

logan1080

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2013
263
80
28
I think my 175" will be easily tossed around. I'm 185lbs before gear and I thought my 154 XM was easy to throw around. I rode a 154 G4 and it was even easier yet. So I think the new 175 that's just 14" longer (look at a tape, that's actually not that much length) than my XM 154 will be similar to a T3 163" or easier to throw around. Less stucks on the deep days too. It's only 1 more paddle on the ground vs 165 so I figured screw it, go 175.
 

cubby

Well-known member
Premium Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,208
499
83
I hear people say that a lot, it's just 1 more lug lol. They sure charge a pretty penny for that 1 extra lug.
 

mountainhorse

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Dec 12, 2005
18,606
11,814
113
West Coast
www.laketahoeconcours.com
I guess it all just depends on the size/weight of the rider, terrain, snow, and how you like to ride.

I've watched a fit 250lb 6'3" guy whip around a 174" in the trees better than a skilled smaller guy on a 154"....

Go figure.

















.
 

mountainhorse

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Dec 12, 2005
18,606
11,814
113
West Coast
www.laketahoeconcours.com
With a 3.5" pitch on the 65 and 75's... and the 2.86" pitch on the 154's ... has something to do with it.

The 165 is really a 164.5" track...with 47 rows of paddles
The 175 is really a 175" track...with 50 rows of paddles
The 154 is really a 154.4" track...with 54 rows of paddles
 
T

Trailsweeper

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2013
89
45
18
With a 3.5" pitch on the 65 and 75's... and the 2.86" pitch on the 154's ... has something to do with it.

The 165 is really a 164.5" track...with 47 rows of paddles
The 175 is really a 175" track...with 50 rows of paddles
The 154 is really a 154.4" track...with 54 rows of paddles


Wait, what?

Are you saying the gen 4 154 is no longer a 3.5 pitch?
 

kcj1317

Well-known member
Premium Member
Sep 29, 2012
369
139
43
St Charles Idaho
Last year I went with 165 and won't ever go longer. Came off a 14 154. While I love the 165 on deep days and can do things the 154 can't for days other than DEEP I go with the 154. Faster, nimble, fun. At least faster now, we will see if that changes with the 18 updates fron Skidoo

Sent from my LGL56VL using Tapatalk
 
Premium Features