• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

To 91 or Not to 91 Fuel Octane

J
Jul 21, 2008
181
55
28
Kirkland
I just purchased a pair of new stock 2011 M8's with the HO engine and now I have to run 91 octane according to spec. I am wondering if anybody has run 89 with octane booster or some other cheaper variation of fuel mixture with any success??

It seems that you get nailed for 91 at the pump because you would be fueling a Porche, Audi or some other high priced ride.

I will run 91 if I have to.

It is impossible to snowmobile and be a tight _ss or cheapskate but I keep trying:face-icon-small-ton

Thanks
 
M
Nov 13, 2010
105
54
28
If you use octane boost to get up to the 91 rating... you will be paying alot more than if you just bought premium in the first place. That stuff doesn't do much.... and if it says it boosts your octain 10 points it really only moves it from 89 to 90, because each octain has 10 points.
 
L

luv2sledmt

Member
Dec 15, 2008
174
22
18
C. Falls, MT
Here my thought. 91 is 10 cents a gallon more than 89, so to fill your 11.5 gallon tank you will be spending just over a dollar more with 91 rather than 89. So when you include the 50 to 75 cents a tank worth of octane boost, you will be saving approximately 50 cents a tank and be gambling with it working. 91 octane seems like a easy decision for me.
 

06m7

Member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 5, 2008
163
6
18
i always run 91 and my buddy same sled only runs 87 never seen a difference at all in performance and mine had octn light come on twice and his not at all so do what u want i still run 91 just not sure if i should be or if its worth it
 

Dam Dave

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Oct 27, 2001
4,302
2,252
113
Montrose
depends on altitude I run what ever but sled is never below 7000'
 

backcountryislife

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
10,893
7,413
113
Dumont/Breckenridge, CO
dude it's like $1.00 more per fill up, $1.00!

and running higher octane cost you performance as well.

There's a sensor for a reason, use it to find out what you need to run, then run it.

If you're running a 1000... a could understand the hesitance to chance it... but on the 8, it's kinda silly.
 

Coldfinger

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
2,351
538
113
Nebraska
we run 85 or 87 in the 91 machines up here, but down low the 11 is a pretty sensitive motor, octn comes on pretty easy on most of them.

Agree, depends what altitude you are running. If you run at sea level, do you have to run higher than 91? The 91 rating is likely at sea level.

The more altitude the less octane needed because the air gets thinner and thus the engines compression goes down.

This is why many mountain fuel stations sell 85 octane.
 

backcountryislife

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
10,893
7,413
113
Dumont/Breckenridge, CO
any thing under 4000ft I wouldn't, or if it has ethanol I wouldn't run under 6000ft. at 10000ft up I would try 87 non E

at 10k we're running 85 with ethanol. Non E doesn't even exist around here anymore. IMO, the whole ethanol thing is WAY overblown.
If, after we've got some miles on it, we start getting the ethanol message, Ill switch, pretty simple.

Worrying about what octane on the 800 seems like one of the most pointless conversations there are imo.
 
J

Jordo

Active member
Nov 3, 2009
205
35
28
Stillwater,MN
Ok u guys r so cheap. It's 8 cents more a gallon. And if u run a 10+ u will get an Oct code and it will put u into limp mode
 
K
Nov 6, 2008
76
16
8
39
Prince George, B.C.
seeing as this is a fuel issue and some are willing to spend the extra cash to keep a motor, I have discovered Chevron is carrying 94-octane 0-ethanol these days. Im going to be running it as well as some 100:1 pre mix, tired of rebuilds.
 
A

AKLankford

Active member
Oct 13, 2009
225
39
28
Wasilla, AK
quick question on the octane ratings.

So here in Alaska i have never seen 91 octane. Highest we have is 90. Is that 1 octane a problem since we all ride at 0-3000?
 

backcountryislife

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
10,893
7,413
113
Dumont/Breckenridge, CO
seeing as this is a fuel issue and some are willing to spend the extra cash to keep a motor, I have discovered Chevron is carrying 94-octane 0-ethanol these days. Im going to be running it as well as some 100:1 pre mix, tired of rebuilds.

Rebuilds?


Because of lack of oil?:face-icon-small-con


Because of lack of octane?:face-icon-small-con


WHERE, WHEN? Show me ONE person who has actually had an M8 go down due to det.

As to oil... the issue is a linkage that can fail, and that 100:1 will let your sled blow just like no oil at all will.


Sorry, but I'm just blown away at the fear-mongering that some of you guys buy into.:face-icon-small-dis

As to limp mode, I'm not suggesting that someone run too low an octane every day, simply that it's not hard to figure out since the det sensor protects you from damage. One day to see what you really need.

It's NOT the $$. You will run the strongest with the least octane you can safely run, running more just costs you HP. (the dollar a tank is a non issue, we're not talking about running 116 here!)


Lankford, I've seen a number of people on ACchat who have mentioned never having any problems with the 90 in AK, some were pretty worried about it, but they found it worked fine.
 

WyoBoy1000

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
11,213
3,928
113
Red Lodge MT to North, CO
at 10k we're running 85 with ethanol. Non E doesn't even exist around here anymore. IMO, the whole ethanol thing is WAY overblown.
If, after we've got some miles on it, we start getting the ethanol message, Ill switch, pretty simple.

Worrying about what octane on the 800 seems like one of the most pointless conversations there are imo.

I agree, I was stating it more as a starting point and if nothing happens then go lower, I still don't like E, all my engine failures happened with it (91e). But it could have just been chitty gas.

For the guys saying where being cheap, we don't care about cost, we care about power and to much octane you will loose power. The sled should put out around 160hp at 0ft, at 10000ft you cut that by 33.333% and it drops you down around 115hp so your not going to need that much octane unless you mod it and get the power back up. HeII we are running 6-8lbs of boost on 91 octane around 10000ft without deto, do you really think you need it on a stocker. Like mentioned the det sensor will let you know.
 
Premium Features