T
I was going over my assault and noticed that the camber on each ski is differnt one is almost verticle in adjustment the other is negative camber, which is it supposed to be and what effect does camber have on handling?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Adrelaine thanks for the explaination I guess my next question would be can there be too much negative camber? I am messing with my assault to try and crispen the handling up a bit on hard pack it seems compared to my XP you have to turn the bars alot more to get any turning to happen, I was wondering on the camber if that changes how quickly it responds to input. That and ofcourse it came with 2 different settings.
There could be too much camber, but you can only run the upper ball joint in and our so far. Are you sure you didn't tweak a lower arm? I have seen other posts where this happened on the 09 Assaults. The camber won't really change the "crispness" or turning, I believe it to be more of an overall set up between caster/camber, toe in and shocks that can cause most people to dislike what their sled handles like, get it right and you will love it. Look at how your XP is set up, in my opinion I like the off trail steering of the XP better than an RMK but my RMK is better on the trail and in the bumps. The XP simply turns sharper and easier but I believe that to be mostly the skis.