R
anyone try a polaris 115 I put it on tonight and it fit pretty well and that belt is tough that was invented for the 900 RMK
I think the XS809 replaces the polaris 115 so that makes sense why it fits good too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
anyone try a polaris 115 I put it on tonight and it fit pretty well and that belt is tough that was invented for the 900 RMK
What offset are you running with the XS809? 1.420 for the longer belt or the 1.450 for 2013?
Should add that we put another 50 miles on it for a total of over 120 miles on this belt and is still doing amazing.
So no shimming the primary for this xs809 belt?
Left stock.... just adjust the deflection with the secondary?
Width is identical between the 2 and center to center measures out to 11.5" and aligned at 1.450. I have 2 XS809 but they are the same so nothing different about them. I like the length on them alot better than the stock ones just need to figure out why I cant get them set right. Seems like no one else is having problems. I must be doing something wrong
So I have been thinking about the spacer vs no spacer theories. If you look at the photos I took of my sled with the clutches completely shifted out (the two faces of the primary are touching each other can't go any further) so it is not going to try to shift up the primary any further. The secondary spacer has not stopped the secondary from opening at this point. I am thinking the spacer can't be causing the belt to keep trying to shift up the primary since it is all the way up prior to shift out spacer contact. Am I missing something? BTW I still think the stock belt is too short.
Woody