• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

APNewsBreak: Obama abandons wilderness plan

Chief

Well-known member
Premium Member
Nov 26, 2007
498
267
63
SL,UT
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=157&sid=15787842

APNewsBreak: Obama abandons wilderness plan
June 1st, 2011 @ 12:30pm
By MATTHEW DALY
Associated Press


WASHINGTON (AP) - Under pressure from Congress, the Obama administration is backing away from a plan to make millions of acres of undeveloped land in the West eligible for federal wilderness protection.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said in a memo Wednesday that his agency will not designate any of those public lands as "wild lands." Instead Salazar said officials will work with members of Congress to develop recommendations for managing millions of acres of undeveloped land in the West. A copy of the memo was obtained by The Associated Press.

Salazar's decision reverses an order issued in December to restore eligibility for wilderness protection to millions of acres of public lands. That policy overturned a Bush-era approach that opened some Western lands to commercial development.

A budget deal approved by Congress prevented the Interior Department from spending money to implement the wilderness policy. GOP lawmakers complained that the plan would circumvent Congress' authority and could be used to declare a vast swath of public land off-limits to oil-and-gas drilling.

Republican governors in Utah, Alaska and Wyoming, filed suit to block the plan, saying it would hurt their state's economies by taking federal lands off the table for mineral production and other uses.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, hailed Salazar's reversal of what he called a "misguided" policy that would have harmed Utah's economy.

"Since the majority of land in Utah is owned by the federal government, it is critically important to strike a balance between the needs of our local communities and the protection of public lands that truly do have wilderness characteristics rather than pandering to environmental extremists," Hatch said. "Today's announcement is a positive step toward restoring that balance."

William Meadows, president of The Wilderness Society, said he was deeply disappointed at the decision, which he said ignores the Bureau of Land Management's obligation to protect wilderness values.

"Without strong and decisive action from the Department of Interior, wilderness will not be given the protection it is due, putting millions of acres of public lands at risk," Meadows said.

Bob Abbey, director of the land management bureau, said the December directive would not have required protection for any particular areas. Designation as wild land could only be made after public comments and review and would not necessarily prohibit motor vehicle use or the staking of new mining claims, Abbey said.

The measure blocking implementation of the wild lands policy was included in a budget bill for the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30.
 

Jeff C

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jul 4, 2001
2,271
1,009
113
59
Mahtomedi, MN
"Without strong and decisive action from the Department of Interior, wilderness will not be given the protection it is due, putting millions of acres of public lands at risk," Meadows said.


At "risk" of what exactly.......

At "risk" that more Americans can actually use their own land?
At "risk" that companies can actually use the mineral rights under this land?

These people are so pathetic....
 

94fordguy

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
14,576
5,244
113
38
Yakima, Wa.
"Without strong and decisive action from the Department of Interior, wilderness will not be given the protection it is due, putting millions of acres of public lands at risk," Meadows said.


At "risk" of what exactly.......

At "risk" that more Americans can actually use their own land?
At "risk" that companies can actually use the mineral rights under this land?

These people are so pathetic....

I get a kick out of that too... So they have been unregulated for millions of years, now all the sudden since they might not be made 'wilderness', now they are at RISK of being destroyed forever?

It is truly sad how our culture has turned to following the alarmists every word.:face-icon-small-sad:face-icon-small-dis
 

cwbyup_22

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
364
145
43
Park City, MT
I get a kick out of that too... So they have been unregulated for millions of years, now all the sudden since they might not be made 'wilderness', now they are at RISK of being destroyed forever?

It is truly sad how our culture has turned to following the alarmists every word.:face-icon-small-sad:face-icon-small-dis

Well said, people don't think for themselves any more they just believe what they hear on the liberal news and read on the internet and then do what ever their told to
 
V
Jan 3, 2008
786
105
43
Eastern Wshington
WASHINGTON (AP) - Ken Salazar said his agency will not designate any of those public lands as "wild lands." Instead Salazar said officials will work with members of Congress to develop recommendations for managing millions of acres of undeveloped land in the West.

IMO, while good news, this means a temporary victory at best. I've no doubt that these "recommendations" that are developed will be much more restrictive than current use guidelines.
 

TurboT

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 18, 2008
509
137
43
W...Y...O
HaHa, gotta love it. Guaranteed the tree humpers are toking a few extra bowls right now to ease their pain!!!
 
Premium Features