S
This sled is almost 2 years old. It is a Cat 1100 with a Nytro motor in it. You will notice that is has a rear cooler and it also has running board coolers. IMO this is the proper way to delete the rad.
Actually the "proper" way "could" be defined as running a propylene Glycol diluted with Ethylene Glycol on a water free system with a water removal device attached. Super cooling with smaller radiator/exchanger and can add more compression and a few degrees more timing. But after having done this a decade ago in a race car it is a pain in the azz and I would not do it on a snowmobile for the small gains. Removing the radiator and getting all that hot air out is worth while to me as all it costs me is a pair of ice scratchers.
And adding heat exchanger in the tunnel causes snow and ice buildup that's why Cat dropped it. But you should know that.
When I put my turbo in if the aftermarket radiator relocate is not available I will be adapting an Apex radiator/fan and diverting the hot air to the exhaust side.
Check out the pic below, it is my old Super Modified running at Pikes Peak International Speedway. The radiator for this Chevrolet small block is actually an air conditioning condenser from an old GM car adapted to fit the radiator hoses. Those condensers are about the size of 4 laptop computers stacked up. And yes it cooled that way. Took a little rerouting of flow path but the size of the cooling device is not near as important as ducting and flow.
In the 80's I built a reverse flow system for my race car as the standard way is to flow water to the block and then to the heads. This pre heats the water and is inefficient in a big way. So I routed the water to go to the heads first and cut 2 tenths of a second off my lap times. Sounds suspect? Look up "corvette reverse cooling" they added that in 1992.
That's as much a class on fluid dynamics as I intend to do and am pretty much done with this.
Really make it hard to give free information here.
Last edited: