• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Viper radiator delete

S

stingray719

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2008
1,698
670
113
Colorado Springs, CO
stingraymods.com
This sled is almost 2 years old. It is a Cat 1100 with a Nytro motor in it. You will notice that is has a rear cooler and it also has running board coolers. IMO this is the proper way to delete the rad.

Actually the "proper" way "could" be defined as running a propylene Glycol diluted with Ethylene Glycol on a water free system with a water removal device attached. Super cooling with smaller radiator/exchanger and can add more compression and a few degrees more timing. But after having done this a decade ago in a race car it is a pain in the azz and I would not do it on a snowmobile for the small gains. Removing the radiator and getting all that hot air out is worth while to me as all it costs me is a pair of ice scratchers.

And adding heat exchanger in the tunnel causes snow and ice buildup that's why Cat dropped it. But you should know that.

When I put my turbo in if the aftermarket radiator relocate is not available I will be adapting an Apex radiator/fan and diverting the hot air to the exhaust side.

Check out the pic below, it is my old Super Modified running at Pikes Peak International Speedway. The radiator for this Chevrolet small block is actually an air conditioning condenser from an old GM car adapted to fit the radiator hoses. Those condensers are about the size of 4 laptop computers stacked up. And yes it cooled that way. Took a little rerouting of flow path but the size of the cooling device is not near as important as ducting and flow.

In the 80's I built a reverse flow system for my race car as the standard way is to flow water to the block and then to the heads. This pre heats the water and is inefficient in a big way. So I routed the water to go to the heads first and cut 2 tenths of a second off my lap times. Sounds suspect? Look up "corvette reverse cooling" they added that in 1992.

That's as much a class on fluid dynamics as I intend to do and am pretty much done with this.

Really make it hard to give free information here.

attachment.php


10mod.gif
 
Last edited:
H
Nov 10, 2009
76
13
8
Denver
Actually the "proper" way "could" be defined as running a propylene Glycol diluted with Ethylene Glycol on a water free system with a water removal device attached. Super cooling with smaller radiator/exchanger and can add more compression and a few degrees more timing. But after having done this a decade ago in a race car it is a pain in the azz and I would not do it on a snowmobile for the small gains. Removing the radiator and getting all that hot air out is worth while to me as all it costs me is a pair of ice scratchers.

And adding heat exchanger in the tunnel causes snow and ice buildup that's why Cat dropped it. But you should know that.

When I put my turbo in if the aftermarket radiator relocate is not available I will be adapting an Apex radiator/fan and diverting the hot air to the exhaust side.

Check out the pic below, it is my old Super Modified running at Pikes Peak International Speedway. The radiator for this Chevrolet small block is actually an air conditioning condenser from an old GM car adapted to fit the radiator hoses. Those condensers are about the size of 4 laptop computers stacked up. And yes it cooled that way. Took a little rerouting of flow path but the size of the cooling device is not near as important as ducting and flow.

In the 80's I built a reverse flow system for my race car as the standard way is to flow water to the block and then to the heads. This pre heats the water and is inefficient in a big way. So I routed the water to go to the heads first and cut 2 tenths of a second off my lap times. Sounds suspect? Look up "corvette reverse cooling" they added that in 1992.

That's as much a class on fluid dynamics as I intend to do and am pretty much done with this.

Really make it hard to give free information here.

attachment.php

It would be alot easier for you if you were not so abrasive and easily offended.......and offensive. Obviously you are smarter (in some instances) than the average fence post, but your replies get you in trouble with even the admins and moderators of forums. Perhaps these forums are not a suitable way for you to communicate.
 
B
Nov 1, 2014
20
10
3
58
Actually the "proper" way "could" be defined as running a propylene Glycol diluted with Ethylene Glycol on a water free system with a water removal device attached. Super cooling with smaller radiator/exchanger and can add more compression and a few degrees more timing. But after having done this a decade ago in a race car it is a pain in the azz and I would not do it on a snowmobile for the small gains. Removing the radiator and getting all that hot air out is worth while to me as all it costs me is a pair of ice scratchers.

And adding heat exchanger in the tunnel causes snow and ice buildup that's why Cat dropped it. But you should know that.

When I put my turbo in if the aftermarket radiator relocate is not available I will be adapting an Apex radiator/fan and diverting the hot air to the exhaust side.

Check out the pic below, it is my old Super Modified running at Pikes Peak International Speedway. The radiator for this Chevrolet small block is actually an air conditioning condenser from an old GM car adapted to fit the radiator hoses. Those condensers are about the size of 4 laptop computers stacked up. And yes it cooled that way. Took a little rerouting of flow path but the size of the cooling device is not near as important as ducting and flow.

In the 80's I built a reverse flow system for my race car as the standard way is to flow water to the block and then to the heads. This pre heats the water and is inefficient in a big way. So I routed the water to go to the heads first and cut 2 tenths of a second off my lap times. Sounds suspect? Look up "corvette reverse cooling" they added that in 1992.

That's as much a class on fluid dynamics as I intend to do and am pretty much done with this.

Really make it hard to give free information here.

attachment.php
[/

What would happen to your race cars motor temperature if all of a sudden the "fresh air" supply was drastically depleted ?

Why is there a "big hole" in front of the race car ? Aero Dynamics ? HELLO !!!
 
Last edited:
S

stingray719

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2008
1,698
670
113
Colorado Springs, CO
stingraymods.com
Ok the radiator delete works FOR ME. Note I said for me and kiddies don't try this at home.

Sorry Neil but this does work. I have tested in steep and deep now without scratchers (of course) and on marginal snow on the road using ice scratchers. This testing done on a converted XTX to a 162 Camoplast x3 track MTX. I will not be putting my radiator back until turbo time and then I have a diff idea for that.

I am not asking or even encouraging any of you to delete your radiator and if you do you do at your own risk, my success does not necessarily equate to yours so be warned. The reason for this disclaimer is obvious if you read some posts in this thread...lol.



attachment.php


20141115_162818.jpg
 

bholmlate

Well-known member
Premium Member
Dec 3, 2009
1,400
778
113
Reno, Nevada
your image would have more of an impact to the point you are trying to make if we couldn't see your sled in the picture because it was covered in 3 Ft of snow which is some peoples idea of deep snow.. Also if the picture was not taken in a flat meadow. Now you will have a whole slew of posts saying that you have not tested it in the steep and deep because the image is portraying anything but "steep and deep" just a general observation

Not here to say it "Does work" or "Deosn't Work" You seem to be happy with it so that all that matters
 
Last edited:
S

stingray719

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2008
1,698
670
113
Colorado Springs, CO
stingraymods.com
your image would have more of an impact to the point you are trying to make if we couldn't see your sled in the picture because it was covered in 3 Ft of snow which is some peoples idea of deep snow.. Also if the picture was not taken in a flat meadow. Now you will have a whole slew of posts saying that you have not tested it in the steep and deep because the image is portraying anything but "steep and deep" just a general observation

Not here to say it "Does work" or "Deosn't Work" You seem to be happy with it so that all that matters

Yeah the only pic I had was digital and grainy but here goes. This pic is taken while going back down, hard to see how deep the snow was going up I was pushing it over the windshield.

attachment.php


20141115_164211.jpg
 

roughrider99

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jan 9, 2008
1,805
252
83
33
Fernie,BC
This sled is almost 2 years old. It is a Cat 1100 with a Nytro motor in it. You will notice that is has a rear cooler and it also has running board coolers. IMO this is the proper way to delete the rad.

NM, do you still feel that going this route is not as good as the rad setup? I'm considering deleting mine for 2 reasons

1. When I crush a tree there's no rad to break since it's so close to the nose

2. Distribute the weight a little better

I did rad delete tunnel cooler with heated running boards on the old mans turbo nytro and I was super happy with it no overheat issues, On my viper demo day, deep heavy snow just plugged the rad and iced over and we had overheat issues
 
S

stingray719

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2008
1,698
670
113
Colorado Springs, CO
stingraymods.com
NM, do you still feel that going this route is not as good as the rad setup? I'm considering deleting mine for 2 reasons

1. When I crush a tree there's no rad to break since it's so close to the nose

2. Distribute the weight a little better

I did rad delete tunnel cooler with heated running boards on the old mans turbo nytro and I was super happy with it no overheat issues, On my viper demo day, deep heavy snow just plugged the rad and iced over and we had overheat issues

On the girlfriends Viper I reversed the fan connector so it blows out, no more ice or snow blocking radiator.
 
B

BigFish BC

Well-known member
Jan 27, 2005
3,348
1,139
113
kitimat b.c
NM, do you still feel that going this route is not as good as the rad setup? I'm considering deleting mine for 2 reasons

1. When I crush a tree there's no rad to break since it's so close to the nose

2. Distribute the weight a little better

I did rad delete tunnel cooler with heated running boards on the old mans turbo nytro and I was super happy with it no overheat issues, On my viper demo day, deep heavy snow just plugged the rad and iced over and we had overheat issues

i know they like them because there is no snow stuck to tunnel with the stock set up,dont know of any issues they had with stock rad plugging.but i could see it happening in the right conditions.not sure there is a lot of weight to save,but i can see moving it off the nose.boost-it had about 20 mtn viper running last year & they found stock system the best for them.
 

roughrider99

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jan 9, 2008
1,805
252
83
33
Fernie,BC
I bought a decent strong bumper from the arctic cart catalog today so hopefully that will do the trick, I would just be more comfortable if that rad wasnt there cause it seems pretty vulnerable to me.
 
S

stingray719

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2008
1,698
670
113
Colorado Springs, CO
stingraymods.com
3 days of riding above freezing here in Colorado. On Saturday it was 51 degrees on Grand Mesa.....very odd. With scratchers down on hard pack went 170 to low 200's on temp and that was the same temp as two other Vipers on the same day riding with me. Couldn't be happier with the radiator delete.

DISCLAIMER: due to varying degrees of skill I advise against you doing this mod and am not responsible for any damage.
 

turbo800

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
848
214
43
Northern,UT
3 days of riding above freezing here in Colorado. On Saturday it was 51 degrees on Grand Mesa.....very odd. With scratchers down on hard pack went 170 to low 200's on temp and that was the same temp as two other Vipers on the same day riding with me. Couldn't be happier with the radiator delete.

DISCLAIMER: due to varying degrees of skill I advise against you doing this mod and am not responsible for any damage.

We had basically the same conditions here in Utah this last weekend. I noticed when I stopped, temps would spike within a few seconds of not moving. Right at 200* the fan and idiot light would kick on. With that said, I have no interest in deleting the radiator. On the upside, NO hot start issues at all :)
 
D
Nov 27, 2013
1,962
917
113
Mountain States
It's never a good idea to immediately turn off your sled. Doing so can cause heat soak which can in some cases cause starting issues 2S or 4S....Before turning off the sled allow the coolant to cycle for a minute or 2 this will prevent internal over heating.....When you turn off your sled immediately your not allowing the coolant to cycle which can cause internal temps to spike due to temps rising without aid from the cooling cycles.

DPG
 
S

stingray719

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2008
1,698
670
113
Colorado Springs, CO
stingraymods.com
Deleting the stock rad is a waste of time and money. There is no way the bulkhead cooler will make up the cooling needed for this motor.

Did anyone consider they didn't use a tunnel cooler because there is just no room for it? Not sure if anyone has looked in the tunnel and seen the header pipe in there? Lol


Had it out last weekend at 40 degrees sun melting the snow and the radiator delete is still cooling fine as long as the scratchers are down.
 
Premium Features