• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

2005 M7 162 70mph top speed

K

killerrf

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2007
978
180
43
sk
i was able to hit 90 mph on my '08 m8 153 standard yesterday. would have been 2" at the most of loose snow. stock 77 cat weights, yellow/white primary, 44/40 helix, shift assist, orange spring, just like the clutch chart shows for 0-3000'. im at 2200' at home. clutches were just warm. could keep my hand on both for however long i wanted to. ran to 80 quite fast then crept up to 90 mph. kinda over revved a bit on top end... 7600-7700.
 
M

mtn_extreme

Well-known member
Nov 11, 2002
1,692
88
48
Nampa, Idaho
Brew,

In your setup I could agree, but if you were to add the shift assist then I would have to say that not to be true. As DonoBBD stated that with the shift assist, your spring pressure is reduced as much as 50#'s.


As for the original question, I do agree with going back to the 36* finish rate helix. Adjust your spring adjust in .4 to compensate for the xs belt (might have to gring a little off the tip of the weights, get to 68gr.) at your elevation and enjoy the 80 mph on the flats. Let us know what you get for track speed up the long steep pull (isn't this where you really want it anyways?)
 
M

mtn_extreme

Well-known member
Nov 11, 2002
1,692
88
48
Nampa, Idaho
clutching notes

Here is some notes that Geo posted a couple years ago about his findings on the m7 clutching. Maybe it will help answer some of you guy's questions.

MX


The D&D and Bikeman dyno sheets are slightly different. Mine feels like Bikeman is closer, kinda peaky, falling off on either side of 7400 to 7700rpm. Funny thing is with the final clutch set-up I chose, the sled started to feel real strong in the 6900 to 7400rpm. range like the exhaust valves started to open earlier. If you compare the D&D sheets from an '06 M7 to the '07 M8 (Crossfires actually) the M7 makes more power at 7800. Track speed is realative to the snow and load (hill) but my comparative numbers from the same hill (small about only a 15 sec. pull but steep, 2 sled length run in at the bottom) I have used for years are; #1: stock (68's, Yellow-white, 36 helix, orange rear) about 41, 42mph. at 7800 to 7860rpm. (about the same as every new sled I've had since 2000 700 doo Highmark); #2: AC recommendations for my altitude (70's, yellow white, 44/40, orange rear), about 43 to 44mph. at 7800 to 7840 (nice gain but the M7 pulled that combo to a higher track speed). Then I tried a softer front spring (AC red) to lower rpm with set-up #2, No change at peak rpm. (I was surprized) or track speed, but the engagement rpm dropped to 3000 rpm and the engine pulled it well (will be hard to get stuck with this soft a start, nice for me), meaning good rip when you want it. Then I tried a big helix I have (50/42) to lower rpm but the sled wouldn't pull the 50 (only 7350 rpm but held it) starting into the hill but it pulled about 45mph track speed. On the flats it created heat at higher speeds. Back to the 44/40. That was day one ( had to do some playing). Day two ( when I get into something I keep going till it's done). At home I changed wieghts to AC 73gr and reinstalled stock the yellow-white because I didn't think the engine would pull the Red spring. When I got to elevation ( about 5500ft), I took a rip across a fresh meadow ( about 2' fresh) and pulled high mph (65 to 70) and rpm about 7750 to 7780. Now we're getting some where but there was something missing in the 1/4 to 3/4 throttle range that I felt with the Red spring in. So I pulled in under one of my favourite old trees and changed to the Red spring. Now I'm at set-up #3;AC 73gr. wieghts, AC red primary spring, AC 44/40 helix and AC orange secondary spring installed at stock hieght. Off to the test hill with a little playing on the way. What a nice package this felt like. Part throttle donuts, wheeling out of creeks, instant track speed, and blurry top speed once you got up on the snow. Fun. Peak rpm. didn't change, 7750 to 7780. At the test hill I did a couple of runs to get #'s to write down then pulled under another good old tree to check clutch temps (not bad, for what I just did in the last 40min. actually pretty good) and record. This set-up pulled 44 to 46 mph at 7750 to 7780 rpm. Good steady shift (no stalls or stops in trackspeed). I was quite happy with this because I know on the bigger hills with more of a run at them it will pull a couple three more mph. Needing a break and because I wanted to try the 46/38 I brought, to see if the sled would pull the 46, I changed it out. Now, #4 set-up; same as #3 except with the AC46/38 helix. Put the stuff back in the pack and take a 10 min. tour to warm up before hitting Test Hill (it felt even stronger in the midrange and bottom). This time I was more surprised. The sled pulled through the 46 into the 38 easily and at a steady 7700 to 7720 rpm. (must have been slipping on the back a bit to lower the rpm. with a shallower helix) on the hill and across the meadows. Track speed on my hill increased to 49 to 51 mph. Top speed on the way back to the truck is everything rubbed off the primary and secondary sheaves (black majic marker marks) and it goes past 80mph way too fast. Clutches are as cool as anything I ever owned. All this is straight off my notes with chit chat between the lines. I've done a few more things with rear spring preload and relocating the helix depth to fine tune for me, but I ain't saying no more (it also doesn't make that much difference). I also went into as detailed a explanation as I could so people don't PM me to ask "what do I use at this elevation with this set-up", 'cause I don't know. This is what works awesome for me and my stock sled at my elevation (to tune for higher elevations try spring before reducing wieght). Hope it helps some. Geo.







Might as well try some clutching on the M8, took the cat clutch tool box to the woods for testing, really don't have good hill yet, but checking some perameters. M8 153 ddy pipe, stock clean belt clutches, 4500-6000 ft al. 1 been too revy since break in, was thinking more weight , hit it........ goes to 8000 and backs down to 78-7900 I think to much. yarded out the stock 68 grm put in 70grm heavy tip, forgot to write down part number in book. But pulled better, starting to wheelie a little, pulling harder but no real change in RPM 2. put in cat #710 73grm I cut to 71.5 last year, this is the lighter tip heavier butt. Punchier in mid, feeling better, still no real RPM difference, feels smoother though at low mid throttle, I think loading the motor some. 3. put in uncut 73 grm 710, more improvement, got to be a little more carefull on trails, launching through some bumps ratched the track, pulling hard, wot hits 8000 still, only place to load its in powder, still to revy 7800 +. So I went up 5 grams, a trail animal now, just got to wait for better climbing conditions to see sustained 20 sec. loads. But for the sake of "tried it", 73 gram weights and put in the short red Cat primary spring that Geo tried, interesting.........about 3400 engagement and the 800 pulls it great off idle, even put it out in the crap, pulls it no hesitation, what a great trail set up for gas mileage and cruising with little throttle, but made the sled lazy, no chance of launching off trail bumps, but with only a 240 or so shift out it pulls 7700 any place I put it on the bar in the powder, you'de think it would drop rpm dramaticlly, didn't.
 

winter brew

Premium Member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
10,016
4,332
113
56
LakeTapps, Wa.
"In your setup I could agree, but if you were to add the shift assist then I would have to say that not to be true. As DonoBBD stated that with the shift assist, your spring pressure is reduced as much as 50#'s."

I assume these numbers are seen on a compressor that doesn't allow the spring to twist as it compresses vs same spring with shift assist bearing??
I agree a spring will show higher numbers if not alowed to twist, but I doubt this is the case in a secondary with a plastic spring washer in good condition and the clutch halves constantly changing position.
I now alot of guys run the orange spring and like it, just not my cup of tea. I see the newer factory settups using the orange have upped the primary weight to like 75-77g to be able to "balance" out with that monster spring. Sounds like it works pretty good too....just not too sure that the 700 has what it takes to make use of that kind of primary weight.
 

cat4ever72

New member
Lifetime Membership
Dec 4, 2007
47
4
8
51
may be your track!!

I have a 900 King Cat and I had the A20 in pow pos. with it in pow pos i could pull 80-85 in a 1' deep meadow. I then switched the track around to Hillclimb position. I lost between 30-35 mph in the same type of conditions.
I've been told they create a fan like effect in the tunnel and won't allow the track to go any faster. Just my .02cents
 
E
Nov 26, 2007
213
2
18
56
I run the 700 with 77's up to 6500 feet, it doesn't really drop off r's until 5000. BUt I don't have an arctic cat spring in either clutch, primary finish is 340, secondary is 395, straight 36, it likes the weight just fine I think
 
C

canyoncat

New member
Dec 2, 2007
6
0
1
59
Wenatchee WA
Lots of good info thanks. I will try some different set-ups still have the 36 on the shelf and some 68's. cat4ever I do have the attac 20 in hill climb position switched it last year now that you mention it I do think it slowed things down a bit I have straighted the lugs this week have not ran it yet to see if that helps. Like the sound of geo's findings will try some of those set ups. should be good sledding this weekend finally some snow yea!!
 
F
Dec 5, 2001
347
37
28
back country
I have the 153 A20 still in my 05 m7, partially straightend,...last spring pulled 85 easy across hard but choppy swamp (maybe my best topend speedrun). Messing with my clutches this fall getting ready, I forgot I was running the 38 with the goodwin blue... It wasn't a good day to get trackspeeds, but close as I could tell, it was pulling over 40 in the short powder climbs I found... Still gotta try the 46/36 progressive and the gold primary...there's always a better setup somewhere, eh?

Thanks for reposting that MX...I really need to copy and save that one.

John
 

Griff

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
658
162
43
I have been following this discussion and trying to learn as much as possible to apply to my situation. Obviously there is debate on the higher vs. lower spring rates in the secondary. My stock M7 runs good, but am always interested in more.

Here's my question:

Will a higher rate secondary spring make my primary more efficient by causing the engine to rev faster thereby utilizing a portion of the primary clutch with a larger radius more of the time?
 
E
Nov 26, 2007
213
2
18
56
Well I run a 395 finsh spring in my secondary, and I really like it, straight 36 helix, I have 340 finsih in the front, with 77 grams, I'm a bit overclutched for sea level, It'll run 830 plus, but we get to 2500 plus real quick and it pulls back to 7950-8000 all the up to 5000 feet
 
Premium Features