zbroz arms really narrow!!

MacDawg productions · Dec 3, 2015

Hey guys,so I put a set of beautiful zbroz 36 a arms on my turbo ed 2015 pro and they are really narrow. I mean 36 inches is measured using both spacers on the ski mount for the widest. I figured a spacer on either side for neutral would achieve the 36 inches. Then you could go 35,36,37 for adjustment. But nope. Went for a ride in revy and I felt the 35 inch was ridiculous. I'm hoping the 36 will be better. I haven't ran a sway bar since 96, and I'm running evols for front shocks. 90 psi in mains and 160 I believe in evol chamber. 230 lbs geared up. Any feed back? She's pretty tippy.

jerrydecoy · Dec 3, 2015

I felt the same on my turbo pro!!! The first day out I felt like I was really struggling but the second and third ride I started to get comfortable with it. Required very little rider input to move it around! I'm 165 lbs and with the narrower kit I spend far less time with wrong foot forward!!!

MacDawg productions · Dec 3, 2015

Oh okay. I'm not going crazy then.lol. it was a pretty deep day so I'll give a few days to get used to it. Felt like I had to relearn how the sled reacted.thx buddy.?

ullose272 · Dec 3, 2015

MacDawg productions said:
Hey guys,so I put a set of beautiful zbroz 36 a arms on my turbo ed 2015 pro and they are really narrow. I mean 36 inches is measured using both spacers on the ski mount for the widest. I figured a spacer on either side for neutral would achieve the 36 inches. Then you could go 35,36,37 for adjustment. But nope. Went for a ride in revy and I felt the 35 inch was ridiculous. I'm hoping the 36 will be better. I haven't ran a sway bar since 96, and I'm running evols for front shocks. 90 psi in mains and 160 I believe in evol chamber. 230 lbs geared up. Any feed back? She's pretty tippy.

Seems like alot of pressure in shocks? I think im running 60 main chamber with my alt impact 36 front.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

DLynn · Dec 4, 2015

I had the same experience with the 36" arms the first few rides. Once I got the feel for it I am positive it was the best thing that could have been done for tight tree riding. I also added the Zbros springs to the stock WE shocks. A trail rider most likely wouldn't benefit much. I have the 37" K-Mods arms on one sled and the 36" on another. Both work very well.

FatDogX · Dec 4, 2015

I'm running the Alternative Impact 36" front end. Started at the narrowest and didn't care for that, thought I could do barrel rolls at that setting!!! ha ha. 35" was a little to tippy, especially on climbs with packed or set up snow. It felt like I was just getting bounced back and forth, side to side and lost over stability. In the deep snow, there really wasn't an issue, so I played with the setting some more. So as of now I'm running it at 37" and it's been good!

ullose272 · Dec 4, 2015

You guys should try a 36" on the narrowest with a ice age promotion. Its dirtbikish

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

BILTIT · Dec 4, 2015

I have kmod 37" on narrowest and kmotion on its way!

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

Search

zbroz arms really narrow!!

MacDawg productions

Well-known member

jerrydecoy

Well-known member

MacDawg productions

Well-known member

ullose272

Well-known member

DLynn

Free Member

FatDogX

Well-known member

ullose272

Well-known member

BILTIT

Well-known member

Similar threads