• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Anyone running 155 tunnel with 163 or 174 rails and track ?

Matthew runge

Goldy
Premium Member
Oct 5, 2018
88
35
18
40
Minnesota
Just wondering how it rides and if it is worth the money it costs to do it. also what track are working good with what gearing and driver size on a factory 2.6 track belt drive machine.
 
P
Mar 21, 2009
193
20
18
Kennewick, Wa
Yup. Did it last year with a 155 to 163. Tunnel length is fine and the 163 rails are a direct swap on the skid. I think it looks better with the longer track and shorter tunnel myself.

Left the belt drive alone, nothing changes there between 55 2.6 to 63 2.6

I ran a camo extreme 2.5 and it was a snow condition dependent performer. I’d get the Polaris 2.6 myself if I was doing it over again.

Ride improves over moguls
 

SRXSRULE

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Aug 25, 2002
2,512
1,592
113
I did this on my 12 and 14 pro, 155 tunnel with a 163 track. Just used oem rails, direct swap. No issues at all.
We did the same swap on a friends 16 axys, again it worked great.
As for gear with your belt drive, you can install the 13-15 pro gears for a little lower gearing. Use the pro gears and your axys belt, works perfect.
 

pinko

Well-known member
Premium Member
Dec 25, 2007
693
123
43
38
Wembley, AB
Was thinking of this after I seen the Burandt vid. Not sure I'd want the longer track but it got me wondering what needs to be done to put the 3" 162 powerclaw in the 163 skid? Just drivers needed or is there more too it?
 

frntflp

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 29, 2007
403
150
43
Plymouth, MN
I used to do these changes by looking at the factory specs for the sled you have (155) and then with a 163. Get the parts that are different. From above, it's rails and track. Should be an easy one. Make sure to verify anything that impacts drive ratios. Clutch spring and weights, gears (pulleys), etc. Factories aren't stupid (most of the time) and the work has already been done for you with an all-around set up - and a GREAT starting point for your new set up. Then tweak as you feel needed.
 

Scott

Scott Stiegler
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 1, 1998
69,618
11,737
113
51
W Mont
Was thinking of this after I seen the Burandt vid. Not sure I'd want the longer track but it got me wondering what needs to be done to put the 3" 162 powerclaw in the 163 skid? Just drivers needed or is there more too it?


I saw that too. Interesting. The Instagram video was just a teaser.
 

Dogmeat

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
Feb 1, 2006
5,343
1,486
113
Castle Rock, CO
I've been wondering if this would work as well, but do a 155" and go to a 174" track with 11" idler wheels instead of the factory 8" .... You'd have to have a custom set of rails designed for proper spacing with the larger idler wheels, but that might give you just enough clearance to be able to run a 174" track in the 155" tunnel ....

If I could make that work I'd probably sell my 174" I have right now and go back to a 155" and just upsize the track :)
 

Matthew runge

Goldy
Premium Member
Oct 5, 2018
88
35
18
40
Minnesota
I agree a 155 tunnel with 174 rails would looks sweet. I wonder how much better handling it would be. I wonder if ice age makes any rails that would help. Thanks for all the good info and help in this post
 

m1kflyingtiger

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jan 28, 2010
1,045
481
83
Soldotna, AK
Does anyone know if the rear skid on the 19 with react rear suspension is any different than the 18 skid
In the parts break down the rails are the same part number. So any changes would be shock calibration not physical mounting locations. I do know there are changes to the arm mount points between the 174 and the 163/155 ones. I believe the drop brackets are further back on the tunnel for the rear mount point.
 

Matte Murder

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Premium Member
May 4, 2011
3,579
2,259
113
What if you get your “insert bodypart “ caught in the track? The flap on the 155 to 163 set up looks like it would protect you from getting sucked into the tunnel by the track but the 155-174? Also how would you even run a flap on the set up?
 

Matthew runge

Goldy
Premium Member
Oct 5, 2018
88
35
18
40
Minnesota
I would not worry about falling into the rear of the track as I where a teather. An as for a snow flap I would not be running one at all. Every thing I think we are talking about here is for a better handling strickley backcounry performance buggy. Not your topical trail mountain machine. Also thanks for the help finding the rear skid changes. Of just springs and Hyfax nothing major
 

Matthew runge

Goldy
Premium Member
Oct 5, 2018
88
35
18
40
Minnesota
Does anyone no a good way for me to trade or sell my 2018 brand new 155 2.6 track for brand new 163 2.6 track or is there a better track to try to use like power claw
 

madmax

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
4,489
3,146
113
Salt lake city
Does anyone no a good way for me to trade or sell my 2018 brand new 155 2.6 track for brand new 163 2.6 track or is there a better track to try to use like power claw

The powerclaw 3” is an amazing track on the axys. Put one on my sidekick axys last year
 
D
Mar 13, 2014
384
382
63
41
Yup. Did it last year with a 155 to 163. Tunnel length is fine and the 163 rails are a direct swap on the skid. I think it looks better with the longer track and shorter tunnel myself.

Left the belt drive alone, nothing changes there between 55 2.6 to 63 2.6

I ran a camo extreme 2.5 and it was a snow condition dependent performer. I’d get the Polaris 2.6 myself if I was doing it over again.

Ride improves over moguls

So you ran yourself over?
 
Premium Features