• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

whats the best track

bootz1981

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 23, 2008
756
370
63
42
zap, nd
i got a 04 900 151 MC, my track is worse for ware, what track is the best to replace it with, i think my track now is a maverick
 
D

diggerdown

Well-known member
Apr 25, 2004
3,452
677
113
Deer Park Wi.
Challenger extreme unless you want to change your drives to 3 pitch, then choose a power claw 153" for powder riding or challenger extreme for going straight up the big ones on firmer snow. You have 2.52 pitch drivers.
 

Rixster

Well-known member
Premium Member
Oct 20, 2005
3,781
651
113
47
Springville, UT
Either the CLAW or the extreme. Just depends on your snow conditions. If you ride light fluffy powder most of the year get the claw. If not get the extreme. Or a take off challenger from a m8 or m1000. those are good 2.25 in paddle tracks.
 

bootz1981

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 23, 2008
756
370
63
42
zap, nd
drivers

where would be a good placed to get them. Is a stock KK 3" drivers. I get all AC parts at cost, so if i can use AC parts its all that much cheaper
 
C
Nov 27, 2007
1,171
198
63
South Jordan, Utah
My friend had one under a turbo poo that did nothing but trench he has a PC now it loves it. Why do you think it would beat the PC.

Trench, are you kidding me?? I beat up on 2010 M8's all last year with PC's. I would say if it trenched, it was setup. I can make any track trench or not trench. And I am not saying the PC is not a bad track, just saying he can do the Polaris track for $400, PC will be more like $600-$700.
 

justinkredible56

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Dec 24, 2007
1,048
362
83
Eagle Mountain, UT
i got a 04 900 151 MC, my track is worse for ware, what track is the best to replace it with, i think my track now is a maverick

Correct me if I'm wrong but the Maverick is a 3" pitch track, which would mean that he wouldn't have to change the drivers and he is good to go if he picks a PC or a CE.
 

WyoBoy1000

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
11,213
3,928
113
Red Lodge MT to North, CO
Trench, are you kidding me?? I beat up on 2010 M8's all last year with PC's. I would say if it trenched, it was setup. I can make any track trench or not trench. And I am not saying the PC is not a bad track, just saying he can do the Polaris track for $400, PC will be more like $600-$700.

What sled do you have it on, is it a turbo. His skid was setup many different ways.
 

WyoBoy1000

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
11,213
3,928
113
Red Lodge MT to North, CO
all joking aside, I would like to see this track out perform a PC, but for now I can't get my head around it, I completely agree that setup has a lot to do with it.
 
Last edited:
C
Nov 27, 2007
1,171
198
63
South Jordan, Utah
I didn't say it was the best always, but I do think it is better the majority of the time. i definitely think it is the best all around track out there. Would put the PC or Camo Extremes close seconds.
 

bootz1981

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 23, 2008
756
370
63
42
zap, nd
best track

i would like to go 16 wide if i got a new one, thats why i thought of a new take of skidont track. my sled is a 151 now, i have alot of ajustment left, i was thinkin of goin with the 154 just to gain a couple. im not worried about the driver cost so gettin new ones isnt that big of a deal. if i have to worrie about 2 or 300 $ then ill should just stay on the porch and watch.
 
C
Nov 27, 2007
1,171
198
63
South Jordan, Utah
i would like to go 16 wide if i got a new one, thats why i thought of a new take of skidont track. my sled is a 151 now, i have alot of ajustment left, i was thinkin of goin with the 154 just to gain a couple. im not worried about the driver cost so gettin new ones isnt that big of a deal. if i have to worrie about 2 or 300 $ then ill should just stay on the porch and watch.

Well hell, if money is no object, 174" x 2.5" all the way!! 16" wides in the shorter length make the sled want to come over backwards, I prefer a little longer in 15" wide, handling is better as well.
 

WyoBoy1000

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
11,213
3,928
113
Red Lodge MT to North, CO
I've heard claims that those with 16x151 work awesome. But I have also seen a maverick removed from a TApex and a 08 162 skid with the PC just dominate the hell out of other equal Tapex's. So a heavier sled with better results.
 
Premium Features