...
Last edited:
Dynotech gets 170+ HP from the new 850
- Thread starter mountainhorse
- Start date
F
That was on a higher than normal humidity day.. And that replaces oxygen.. Jim said himself there is a few more ponys to be made out of it under normal conditions
S
Dynotec numbers are always fawked.... Have bee for years
S
History and Data :face-icon-small-dis
F
Extremely accurate to myself as well.. They have tested same sled years apart to find almost no difference..
J
Does anyone have the HP numbers from Dynotech for the 15/16 Poo? And do they have access to the 17 Poo? I read 154 hp on the 16. But not sure if that is correct.
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
That was on a break-in mode ecu if I remember correctly. It should make a few more in post break-in mode.
D
the 163 hp for the etec 800's seems high to me. my 08 ptek 800 seems similar to the etec 800's
Sounds like am excuse to me !!
F
Take it the way you wish, just quoting Jim at dynotech
Poo number was 154.6 after breakin
Back to what this thread is about. The awesome 850 that Doo has built for us.
It would be very interesting see the power and torque curves of this engine vs the 800 etec. With the awesome bottom end this engine has I bet this sled will be able to kill it in the trees. I'll definitely be looking into making mine a big bore. Hopefully Big John can get this engine to bore out to make it a 925. That would be a monster!
It would be very interesting see the power and torque curves of this engine vs the 800 etec. With the awesome bottom end this engine has I bet this sled will be able to kill it in the trees. I'll definitely be looking into making mine a big bore. Hopefully Big John can get this engine to bore out to make it a 925. That would be a monster!
Last edited by a moderator:
154 hp is correct on the 15 and 16 axys at dtr
P
170hp out of this new engine is pretty impressive. i can see why the polaris guys are angry, 16hp is significant
100+ tq from 6800 on up...
169+ hp from 7800-8100...
new lighter flyweight style clutch that is better than the TRA...
10 lb lighter track...
haters gunna hate-BJ
169+ hp from 7800-8100...
new lighter flyweight style clutch that is better than the TRA...
10 lb lighter track...
haters gunna hate-BJ
track- 10lbs
clutch-3lbs
crank-2lbs
add belt drive-2 to 3lbs
170 hp and 17 to 18 lbs less rotating mass is darn impressive.
clutch-3lbs
crank-2lbs
add belt drive-2 to 3lbs
170 hp and 17 to 18 lbs less rotating mass is darn impressive.
D
I often times don't agree with Brother John, but this time I do ... The new drive clutch is a huge move forward for Skidoo and if your a mountain rider you have to like the torque of the 850 ... The only complaint I have heard about the 2017 sled is the 3.5 pitch on hard pack vibrates, Who Really Cares about hard pack.
DPG
DPG
I though Doo was always making more HP than Poo? realistically what is the difference between the 16s and the 17s? Last question is skidoo still doing chaincase or are they 100% belt drive belt drive now?
Poo was at 154 last year right? And the years before that it was lower than that?
Last, for the sake of completeness, what is an A/C making these days?
Yes Doo has always been ahead of poo in hp. They are still chaincase.
Poo is at 154. The old pro was 145 ish.
I believe cat is at 162-165?
Sinceere question....
Where does it say that the crank on the 850 is 2 lbs less than the 800 E-Tech crank? I must have missed it but would like to see that.
I thought the new clutch was 2 lbs lighter than the heavy TRA?
I've heard great things about this new 850 from people that I respect in the field that have some seat time on the sled and are not compensated in some way by SkiDoo... some are die hard Polaris riders.
Keep on pushing the envelope BRP!
.
.
Last edited: