H
Isn't Yamaha getting 150 from a N/A motor with at least 50cc less displacement? Wasn't all the weight associated with a 4 stroke supposed to be offset by big horsepower numbers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't Yamaha getting 150 from a N/A motor with at least 50cc less displacement? Wasn't all the weight associated with a 4 stroke supposed to be offset by big horsepower numbers?
First off its 177 hp and its only a twin not a four banger. It also will most likely weigh 100 to 150 lbs less.
dude this cat engine has been out for 3 years, its nothing new. the yamaha engine is a quad, 4 cylinders hence why it produces more hp. the cat is only a twin.
im sick of all these stupid threads that have no point what so ever but to piss people off. :face-icon-small-con
So it's not a new engine, by design it is going to be down on horsepower when compared to the rest of the market, it isn't any lighter than other four strokes producing more horsepower... what else did I miss here?
I think the reason that you are seeing so many of these threads is because there are a lot of people who are disappointed with arctic cats attempt at a new mountain sled.
wow you must be a full blow ``ruhtard`` its a 3 year old engine, same thing that is has been, how is it down on hp? it has the most hp in the market you dumbass? it isnt any lighter then any four stroke? ohhh i didnt know you seen the published weights from cat?
:face-icon-small-con:face-icon-small-con:face-icon-small-con:face-icon-small-con
I know your still young dumb and full of cum so I will splain to you a little more slowly. The TURBO 1100 is only making 170 HP, the Yamaha stock is making over 150 with 50cc less displacement. So tell me genius if the turbo makes 170, how much horsepower do you think the naturally aspirated 1100 makes?
That's how it's down on horsepower and that's why it isn't the industry leading 4 stroke. Shouldn't you be in school right now instead of playing the internet?
I know your still young dumb and full of cum so I will splain to you a little more slowly. The TURBO 1100 is only making 170 HP, the Yamaha stock is making over 150 with 50cc less displacement. So tell me genius if the turbo makes 170, how much horsepower do you think the naturally aspirated 1100 makes?
That's how it's down on horsepower and that's why it isn't the industry leading 4 stroke. Shouldn't you be in school right now instead of playing the internet?
I know your still young dumb and full of cum so I will splain to you a little more slowly. The TURBO 1100 is only making 170 HP, the Yamaha stock is making over 150 with 50cc less displacement. So tell me genius if the turbo makes 170, how much horsepower do you think the naturally aspirated 1100 makes?
That's how it's down on horsepower and that's why it isn't the industry leading 4 stroke. Shouldn't you be in school right now instead of playing the internet?
OK FACTUAL INFO FOR THE THREAD CATS 4S IS 1056CC 120HP N/A TWIN
CATS TURBO IS 177HP STOCK MORE WITH AFTERMARKET STUFF
FACT 2010 YAMAHA GENESIS IS 1049CC 130HP N/A THREE CYLINDER
FACT NO TURBO/ AFTERMARKET NUMBERS ARE SIMALAR TO CATS
:scared::nod::wave::loco:
How do you figure?? Even at meager HP numbers a yammy on 13 lbs which is what the Cat is running to achieve 177 is going to be in the 240 hp range. That makes them pretty darn equal right? I mean all you guys are claiming that speedwerx can get 240 out of them with just a fuel controller...Yah two cylinders versus three equals more torque but the displacement is too similar to make an arguement. Besides that, the only guy who has built a full out mountain version with this "proven" motor is CR Racing, and even Chad says it doesnt pull as hard or even compare. Until someone can actually get a weight on the sled, the fact that its gonna be a boondocker is pretty much a mute topic.
On a side note, I am kind of fond of the looks of the chassis minus the a arms