Not yet. They were just manufacturing the first run of those tracks this week.
Camso (Camoplast) Conquer 280 is here!
- Thread starter RACINSTATION
- Start date
S
I just ordered one, taking off my Camo X3 and putting this on.
Should be there in the morning....thanks for the business!
280 track
Is camso going to make this track in a longer than 165" length with the 3.5" pitch?
What's the cost of a 174" 3" pitch 280 track shipped to sakatchewan Canada?
PM me if you can't post the price here.
Is camso going to make this track in a longer than 165" length with the 3.5" pitch?
What's the cost of a 174" 3" pitch 280 track shipped to sakatchewan Canada?
PM me if you can't post the price here.
No plans at this time for a longer 3.5" pitch.
PM is on the way.
PM is on the way.
Backorders have now been filled on the 280 154 and 165 3.5" tracks for all my customers that pre ordered. These tracks are available to ship now!!
B
any weights on the 165 or 154 Thanks
Sent from my SM-G930R7 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930R7 using Tapatalk
44lbs and 42lbs respectively.
RS... is that actual weight, on your scale, no box?
If those are actual "scale" weights.... Seems the 3"-pitch 280 tracks work out to be about .84lbs per row of paddles and track section.. and the 3.5" pitch work out to be about .93lbs per row.
That is a light track design.
This is the track I really want to see an apples to apples comparison of for performance on the same sleds with same setup besides the track to compare a 3.5"-pitch to a 3" pitch... 165 vs. 162. as both are same paddle, same rubber, same belting, same width... to pare it down to just the pitch difference... even if there is a 2.5" difference in track length. (actual measure is 164.5" on a "165" 3.5"-pitch track with 47 rows of paddles)... in Blower-pow and set up pow.
The 165 has 47 rows of paddles... the 162 has 54 rows of paddles.
Would be cool to see what conditions each pitch "shines" in.
.
.
.
If those are actual "scale" weights.... Seems the 3"-pitch 280 tracks work out to be about .84lbs per row of paddles and track section.. and the 3.5" pitch work out to be about .93lbs per row.
That is a light track design.
This is the track I really want to see an apples to apples comparison of for performance on the same sleds with same setup besides the track to compare a 3.5"-pitch to a 3" pitch... 165 vs. 162. as both are same paddle, same rubber, same belting, same width... to pare it down to just the pitch difference... even if there is a 2.5" difference in track length. (actual measure is 164.5" on a "165" 3.5"-pitch track with 47 rows of paddles)... in Blower-pow and set up pow.
The 165 has 47 rows of paddles... the 162 has 54 rows of paddles.
Would be cool to see what conditions each pitch "shines" in.
.
.
.
Last edited:
Actual weights. That is with the blue wrapping still on the track so that would be a bit. TKI just got his track and weighed it and it came in at 45.5 on his scale (165).
Back fully stocked with all lengths and pitches.
