Iceage ELEVATE kit - interesting!!!
- Thread starter Chewy22
- Start date
iceageperformanceTake your riding to the next level with the ELEVATE kit by IceAge Performance. Starting with the already powerful platform of the Arctic Cat, we built a spindle / rail combination that drastically improves the agility, handling, and deep snow performance by lifting the chassis to a height similar to it's OEM counterparts. This increase in height allows the sled to glide over the snow with ease and reduces running board and side panel drag. The ELEVATE kit turns your Arctic Cat into a machine capable of dominating the gnarliest terrain the mountains can throw at you. The kit includes spindles, rails, and all the hardware necessary to install.
Raises front end 2" and rear 3/4" with spindles and rail kit.
http://www.iceageperformance.com/arctic-cat-rails/mountain/ascender-chassis/elevate-ascender-chassis.html
Wonder if they'd sell me just the front end parts since I'm already an inch or more higher in the rear with my kmod?
http://www.iceageperformance.com/arctic-cat-rails/mountain/ascender-chassis/elevate-ascender-chassis.html
Wonder if they'd sell me just the front end parts since I'm already an inch or more higher in the rear with my kmod?
Last edited:
I too would be interested in just spindles, i put a 38” front end on my 2012 with non shortened shocks and liked the slightly taller front end
Last edited:
Great!...another expensive part I really really want:face-icon-small-fro
Couple things. One is this suppose to make this comparable to the axys, is that kind of the goal as far as approach angle and lifting it? I only got to ride an 18 on a 2ft pow day that quickly turned to 55 degree concrete but it was getting hung up a lot.
Second when you go to the new g2 ski for the 19 cats, does this spingle set up work for that or ?
3rd how do replacement spindles and cost work
4, shock length and all that the same?
Second when you go to the new g2 ski for the 19 cats, does this spingle set up work for that or ?
3rd how do replacement spindles and cost work
4, shock length and all that the same?
Wonder if lowering the tunnel mount is necessary?
$1,795 seems high for rails($600) and spindles($1,195)...?
$1,795 seems high for rails($600) and spindles($1,195)...?
Shut up and run my card.
Apparently they're charging $900 for a set of "custom" 156 rails for a Cat now. So these are probably more like $1000 rails and $800 spindles :face-icon-small-win
Regardless I intend to call after Haydays to get some info on what all is included, thinking behind the design/geometry, and hopefully some part weights. Curious what the deal with the steering stop is.
Regardless I intend to call after Haydays to get some info on what all is included, thinking behind the design/geometry, and hopefully some part weights. Curious what the deal with the steering stop is.
Ran the skinz front end kit on my 14. I really liked the height increase but not the forward part. Sled layed over super easy and sidehilled great but felt long. Could not whip around as quickly as I’d like in the trees. Also felt like the front would slam down harder if you landed a little tail heavy on a jump.
Does not look like the elevate kit moves anything forward. Interested to know what the change in center of gravity does. If it increases or decrease the sweet spot on sidehills.
Felt like there was a little more ski turn with the skinz kit, similar affect as the Wyo steering mode. So also curious about the steering stop. Certainly don’t want a decrease in ski swing.
Spendy but may work awesome! Wyo seemed to swear by his raised boards. This seems like it would have similar results, just a different approach.
Does not look like the elevate kit moves anything forward. Interested to know what the change in center of gravity does. If it increases or decrease the sweet spot on sidehills.
Felt like there was a little more ski turn with the skinz kit, similar affect as the Wyo steering mode. So also curious about the steering stop. Certainly don’t want a decrease in ski swing.
Spendy but may work awesome! Wyo seemed to swear by his raised boards. This seems like it would have similar results, just a different approach.
I’m probably gonna try to find longer shocks and then just drop the rear skid a bit, cheaper that way
Longer shocks will bend ur tierods.
U can't run the 13-15 shocks on a 36" front without tierod spacers...
By doing it this way you are significantly increasing the approach angle undoing the progress made by the drop and roll. By changing rail profile along with the spindle change you can maintain a flatter approach angle and prevent trenching.
Yes for sure but this was cheap and like I said I liked the way it felt/handled. Also my ‘12 had the 13 skid location with front shock lower mount moved forward with limiter straps out all the way and an 162x3 challenger,, -55lbs forms stock with a boat load of bolt on’s so trenching didn’t seem to be an big issue
I need to ask Kevin if the steering mod works with this. I already have hardly any clearance on my tie rods. Seems like lifting the front end would raise the height on the a-arm angle and have them come in contact with the tie rods.
Curious what happens to the approach angle with this kit if the front is raised 2” and 3/4” in the rear? Maybe I missed that somewhere.
I do agree that the price seems high for rail and spindles... but I suppose you are paying for R&D.
Maybe they've moved the tie rod mount up on the spindle some to help with clearance? The fact they mention something about a steering stop leads me to believe it's likely not compatible with the wyo/kmod steering bracket.
The raw blocks of aluminum needed to make those spindles are probably $300 each. 2*$300 + 2*1hr CNC time @ $100/hr + $400 rails + $100 brackets/hardware + 20% profit adder = $1560 already without R&D costs figured in.
The raw blocks of aluminum needed to make those spindles are probably $300 each. 2*$300 + 2*1hr CNC time @ $100/hr + $400 rails + $100 brackets/hardware + 20% profit adder = $1560 already without R&D costs figured in.
I think i may be the only snowmobiler that is not stuck on approach angle?
Approach angle only matters when ur stopped or traveling real slow.
A long time ago, i made a 96 MXZ in to a longtrack extra tall sled.
That thing couldn't keep 2 skis on the ground around any corner but it side hilled like a friggin champ, way before sidehilling was cool.
6 tooth drivers to fit the 2in paddles with jacked up suspension, it had a steep approach angle. It did great in the deep snow.
Approach angle only matters when ur stopped or traveling real slow.
A long time ago, i made a 96 MXZ in to a longtrack extra tall sled.
That thing couldn't keep 2 skis on the ground around any corner but it side hilled like a friggin champ, way before sidehilling was cool.
6 tooth drivers to fit the 2in paddles with jacked up suspension, it had a steep approach angle. It did great in the deep snow.
It looks like the height increase comes from the space between the lower a-arm mount and the ski. Assuming the a-arm angles would be very similar to stock??
Similar threads
