• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Wolverine Listing as "Threatened" Proposed

TreewellDweller

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 18, 2008
447
169
43
McCall, Idaho
Well folks, it is happening! The wolverine has officially been proposed to be listed as "Threatened" and the process for controlling their destiny begins.
Here is the link for the official statement from US Fish & Wildlife: https://www.fws.gov/press-release/2...s-federal-protection-threatened-species-under
The land representative for the Idaho State Snowmobile Association (ISSA) just sent me this statement:

What this document does. This document is both (1)a final rule listing the contiguous U.S. DPS (Distinct Population Segment) of the North American wolverine as a threatened species under the Act; and (2) an interim rule issued under the authority of section 4(d) of the Act (an “interim 4(d) rule”) providing the prohibitions, and exceptions to those prohibitions, that are necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of the contiguous U.S. DPS of the North American wolverine. The basis for our action. Under the Act, we may determine that a species is an endangered or threatened species because of any of five factors: (A) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence. We have determined that the contiguous U.S. DPS of the North American wolverine is a threatened species due primarily to the ongoing and increasing impacts of climate change and associated habitat degradation and fragmentation. Section 4(a)(3) of the Act requires the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) to designate critical habitat concurrent with listing to the maximum extent prudent and determinable. We have not yet obtained the necessary economic information needed to develop a proposed critical habitat designation for the contiguous U.S. DPS of the North American wolverine. Therefore, we find that designation of critical habitat for the DPS is currently not determinable. Interim 4(d) Rule The need for the regulatory action and how the action will meet that need. Consistent with section 4(d) of the Act, this interim 4(d) rule provides measures that are tailored to our current understanding of the conservation needs of the North American wolverine. Under section 4(d) of the Act, the Secretary of the Interior has discretion to issue such regulations as she deems necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of the species. The Secretary also has the discretion to prohibit by regulation with respect to a threatened species, any act prohibited by section 9(a)(1) of the Act. Summary of the major provisions of the regulatory action. This interim 4(d) rule will provide for the conservation of the contiguous U.S. DPS of the North American wolverine by prohibiting the following activities, unless they fall within the specific identified exceptions or are otherwise authorized or permitted: importing or exporting; take; possession and other acts with unlawfully taken specimens; delivering, receiving, carrying, transporting, or shipping in interstate or foreign commerce in the course of commercial activity; or selling or offering for sale in interstate or foreign commerce. The interim 4(d) rule will also provide for the conservation of the species by allowing exceptions to the general prohibitions against “take” of the species in support of conservation actions and otherwise lawful activities that could take wolverines but at minimal levels not likely to have a negative impact on the species’ conservation. The exceptions include take due to scientific research conducted on wolverines by a Federal or Tribal biologist in the course of their official duties, incidental take resulting from forest management activities for the purposes of reducing the risk or severity of wildfire, and incidental take resulting from legal trapping conducted consistent with State and Tribal trapping rules or guidelines that contain steps to minimize the potential for capture of wolverine.

FYI:
The difference between threatened and endangered species is:
· Endangered species are those plants and animals that have become so rare they are in danger of becoming extinct.
· Threatened species are plants and animals that are likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
· Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), plant and animal species may be listed as either endangered or threatened.
 
Last edited:

Pickin’ Boogers

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 5, 2013
384
318
63
Aren't there already "threatened" and "endangered" species with habitats that overlap public land with legal snowmobile access? I'm fully aware the usual non-profits will leverage the wolverine against snowmobiling, but what's the difference between it and the other species?
 

TreewellDweller

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 18, 2008
447
169
43
McCall, Idaho
Aren't there already "threatened" and "endangered" species with habitats that overlap public land with legal snowmobile access? I'm fully aware the usual non-profits will leverage the wolverine against snowmobiling, but what's the difference between it and the other species?
Yes, there are. Take the Canadian Lynx. It is threatened and 100s of 1000s of acres of national forests are restricted/closed due to bad science that states they should be protected. The US Fish & Wildlife and the USFS will attest that the science used to list them is now outdated and incorrect. But fear of lawsuits keep them from changing the out-of-date closures and restrictions.
All of this is just another nail (or nails) in the coffin for back-country winter recreation.
According to the studies, if a wolverine notices or realizes you are in the vicinity it is considered an "impact" to the animal. The greenies define an "impact" as something negative.
All of this is nothing more than an avenue to restrict snowmobiles to trails like motorcycles, atvs, and utvs. Boondocking will be a thing of the past.
 
S
Jan 21, 2016
39
63
18
Yes, there are. Take the Canadian Lynx. It is threatened and 100s of 1000s of acres of national forests are restricted/closed due to bad science that states they should be protected. The US Fish & Wildlife and the USFS will attest that the science used to list them is now outdated and incorrect. But fear of lawsuits keep them from changing the out-of-date closures and restrictions.
All of this is just another nail (or nails) in the coffin for back-country winter recreation.
According to the studies, if a wolverine notices or realizes you are in the vicinity it is considered an "impact" to the animal. The greenies define an "impact" as something negative.
All of this is nothing more than an avenue to restrict snowmobiles to trails like motorcycles, atvs, and utvs. Boondocking will be a thing of the past.
They finally found their way to restrict snowmobiles in the back country. Back in the 1980's they used the spotted owl to severely impact logging. I met a guy roaming some state forest marking trees within a timber sale. I questioned him on how they planned on doing the cut. The guy was all joyful to reply how they intended to thin the trees and make clearings within the timber sale for the spotted owl. When they used the spotted owl to curtail most logging in the 80's it was because the spotted owl did not like clear cuts. hmm. Any lie is good lie if they get what they want. I believe the wolverine numbers are so low that snowmobiles would have 0 impact on their habitat. If an encounter happened these elusive critters would just simply move into a area that has very limited use by humans.
 

TreewellDweller

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Feb 18, 2008
447
169
43
McCall, Idaho
Don’t let them fool you. There are quite a few wolverines where we all ride, they just have such large areas per animal that you rarely see them. A male will have an area of around 65,000 acres. A female covers about 60-70% of that.
The first statement in any biologist’s report is how elusive the wolverine is. When you have an area of your own that is over 100 square miles you can keep from being seen. But they can’t hide their tracks.
I have a map showing 2 gps collared juveniles that stayed all winter relatively close to a major groomed snowmobile trail. It sure didn’t appear that the sleds bothered them.
It is interesting to see how the greenies pick what science they want to preach. And they have the financial backing to do so.
 

M7sleddn

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Dec 11, 2007
79
81
18
Twin Falls, Id
This is not good. If you look at the maps that detail the mountains where they live, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and Washington will pretty much be shut down. if they stop snowmobiles and motorbikes Everybody better complain until all the ski hills are shut Down also as they are right in the middle of their territory.
 
Premium Features