W
Will a 162 x 15 x 2.50 track fit on my 2012 Polaris 800 Pro RMK 163? I know i would have to change out the drivers to a 3.0.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shouldn't be an issue, but likely have to install 7 tooth drivers. The 3.0 pitch is slightly larger then the stock polaris drivers, and the Avid 7 tooth are slightly smaller - better AOA & track to bulkhead clearance.Will a 162 x 15 x 2.50 track fit on my 2012 Polaris 800 Pro RMK 163? I know i would have to change out the drivers to a 3.0.
.Skadi:Since Allen was doing my skid swap I thought I would have him do my track swap as well. I decided to go with the new Peaks track from Camoplast and it wasn't quite as simple as just a track swap for me!! Due to some of the conditions we're forced to ride in here in the beautiful Northwest we thought it best to give my sled just a little more clearance through the tunnel. The 2.5" track with the stock drivers was TIGHT!! Allen and Curt with Fastrax and Eric (Mtnhorse) thought long and hard about the BEST way to go about this. There were a few ideas and we decided to go with the cheapest first since we all know we're all watching our pocketbooks these days!! The solution was to mill out a portion of the chaincase so that smaller drivers could fit! Easy!! (well, easy for a shop like Fastrax to do!!) Curt advised Allen on the best way to do this so that it could be done quickly but in the future if I need to do this I will send it to Curt as he's getting himself fully set up to have this milled and to turn it around quickly!
I'm running the new X-3 3" track 9220. It works awesome. It's a lighter weight easier to turn 3" track that works great on a stock sled like mine. 7 tooth Avid drivers(on a steel 12 driveshaft) was the only "mod" required. I know 2 guys running it on their turbos and they LOVE it too!
TRS... Have you compared the 9105 to the 9175 side by side... worth it if you haven't... also weight diff is something to factor in... the 9175 is lighter.
Snomac... the PC 2.6 WILL fit in with the 7 tooth drivers... you have to urn the AVID PC-style drivers with this track... which also means trimming the rails and running an anti stab.... I'm hearing great reports back from people running the PC-2.6 in the PRO Chassis...
Matt.... the 9220 (X3) is a great track and easy mod as you've shown. The lug design is the same as the 9175
I've seen some torn-up in the spring riding and don't recommend them to people that do a lot of mixed hardpack/trail and mtn riding...some are not as careful as others. If you do a lot of mixed riding... recommend the 2.5" track as they are more durable in these situations. According to Camoplast, the X3, by virtue of the taller lugs, is not as tolerant of mistakes... also about a $350 - $400 price diff. In heavy spring conditions the 9105/9175, in my experience, have more downhill control in braking.
The 9220, you still have to use the AVID PC style drivers with that track as there are no involute drive nubs
Lots of choices out there for tracks... choose wisely and you'll have fun...
MH,
I have not tried one. I would if they built one in a 2.86 pitch.
Wait till next season :face-icon-small-win
It may only be me, the 7 tooth 3.0 pitch driver causes a vibration issue. It also carries the track to far around the driver before release.
Did you use the PC style Avids or the standard style? I've noticed a Huge reduction in this vibration compared to the others...The PC style does not ride ontop of the clips... It turns in the rubber involutes unless it starts to ratchet...
I have also witnessed the rub pad/ FTS clearance tab torn from the top of the front torque arm. Caused by a 7 tooth driver clearance issue. Shock then damages the track. I have added small idler wheels to the torque arm to relieve this problem.
I've done this as well... good mod huh... Wahl made setscrew collar ones for me for a good price.
Tony