You've likely done much of the research on the web, but I thought they once pointed to having the most potential on piston ported two strokes. FWIW, may want to check US patent office (PTO) for more details if you haven't, since the kooky eco-nazi indian inventor had a US patent number. By no means am I knocking the concept and application - a mill and dyno time would be hugely revealing. Good luck, thanks for sharing!
Yes, I did research this process and patent after my buddy informed me of his findings.
My issue with the Singh groove piston mod, did the new pistons and rings create the dyno'd performance gain he witnessed? Along with the bottom end clean up? That's why I thought I would post it here to see if anyone else gave it a whirl.
I have also been researching intake tract and piston dimpling. There are more positive reports on this mod from NASCAR, BMW, NISSAN, and many more. One Sanction body had a car that was slow all year, final race of the of the season it was a screamer. They confiscated the car. Upon engine inspection they found a dimpled intake manifold. These were 650 hp NA engines. Upon Dyno testing the manifold against a non dimpled, on the same engine, on two runs the dimpled made 22hp and 24hp more. That is a huge improvement.
Here is a sample of what I am referring to. This is a very intricate design compared to many I have researched.
