Love my Pro, but that's a funny one there.....:face-icon-small-ton
Best loud can for Pro RMK?
- Thread starter Bergh
- Start date
Love my Pro, but that's a funny one there.....:face-icon-small-ton
Skinz Super-Q here. Even being the 'louder' option from Skinz, it is still pretty mild mannered. Fit and finish were were great to boot. No complaints here. :madgrin:
My sled had a BMP Powder Lite installed when I bought it. I really liked the sound, but not the volume. That can was STUPID loud. :face-icon-small-con
Last edited:
Anybody tried the TSS cans on a Pro? Curious what kind of sound they have
What about for a PRO RMK 600? Picking up a '14 demo for the wife and kids this week, and would like to be able to hear them over my sled so I can keep tabs on them. Don't want to have one that's obnoxiously loud, nor lose performance. I've got a line on a used Super Q....thoughts??
I run an hps, however, I do switch it to stock depending on the riding area. It's a great can, has a nice deep sound there are videos on you tube. I switch back if I know I want to be a bit sneaker or there is a strong probability of a hangover.
I've got an Ultra Q on my wife's 13. I'm a Skinz fan though. It does sound nice. I think the Super Q is too loud, but that is me.
I got myself a GGB mountain can. It sounds so Awesome that all my buddy's are getting them. They love the noise it makes. They are very well built.
P
Can anyone chime in that has been around both the GGB mountain can and the HPS can, which is louder? throatier? fitment? GGB looks to be quite a bit cheaper but sometimes you get what you pay for….
P
Oops i guess i should have read this thread closer, anyone else been around both?
S
by the video the trail can loses 5 lbs. and adds the can sound but almost as quiet as the stock, the mountain one is just obnoxious for 7 lbs loss
Last edited:
I think the ceramic coating really affects the price between an HPS and GGB. With that said I just purchased a Super Q can for my 15 RMK 800 LE. Can't wait to try it out!
diamonds s is what I have no performance gain but it's light as hell!
H
Has anyone actually weighed the stock can off a 14or 15 pro? I just grabbed a mbrp trail can cause its stainless( no maintenance) and it weighed 6.3 lbs. my sled isn't here yet so I can't weigh stock can. That info would be appreciated
Thanks Dallas
Thanks Dallas
H
I would love a diamond s trail can but it's a bit pricey for my blood. It's stupid light 3.8 lbs and supposedly fairly quiet.
Find a used HPS can if you can.
Great fitment. Good sound.
They are noticeably louder than stock unfortunately.
Here's a sample. There is some WOT at 1:10
Yeah there's music but you can hear the exhaust just fine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn5jSbtlylQ&list=UUVX0TCS3bupT0wiB3Elfd7A
Great fitment. Good sound.
They are noticeably louder than stock unfortunately.
Here's a sample. There is some WOT at 1:10
Yeah there's music but you can hear the exhaust just fine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn5jSbtlylQ&list=UUVX0TCS3bupT0wiB3Elfd7A
Last edited:
Skinz Ultra Q or Hps
I really like the sound of the skinz ultra Q can, Super Q is a littler lighter and louder but not too bad. I had a jaws on my last sled and it was just way too loud for my liking. My cousin has an hps on his pro but for 400 dollars for a glass packed can is expensive. The skinz can is fully baffled instead so the insulation will not pack out and will keep the same sound from new to 6000 miles. Not like your pro will get to that mileage anyways without a fix kit in it. Im a cat guy but I am flabergassed by the amount of people buy the pro 800's when they need a fix kit from out of the box and only come 145-150 stock. I know the pro chassis rides really nice I will say that. But how do they still produce an engine that they are in denial about any reoccurring issue. Anyways, Id go with skinz.
I really like the sound of the skinz ultra Q can, Super Q is a littler lighter and louder but not too bad. I had a jaws on my last sled and it was just way too loud for my liking. My cousin has an hps on his pro but for 400 dollars for a glass packed can is expensive. The skinz can is fully baffled instead so the insulation will not pack out and will keep the same sound from new to 6000 miles. Not like your pro will get to that mileage anyways without a fix kit in it. Im a cat guy but I am flabergassed by the amount of people buy the pro 800's when they need a fix kit from out of the box and only come 145-150 stock. I know the pro chassis rides really nice I will say that. But how do they still produce an engine that they are in denial about any reoccurring issue. Anyways, Id go with skinz.
I agree with MH. A weight savings is possible but not a power increase. More than likely, you will get more decibels with a loss of power. For my money and the 4 year warranty, the stock can is the best one. Save your money and buy a 16 H.O. with 165 horsepower with the stock can. That is what I am going to do. I have had loud sleds in the past that left my head hurting and ears ringing after a ride. Not my cup of tea anymore. The access issue that we should all be worried about is reason enough to leave it stock. If you want power, put a turbo or supercharger on it.
K
I was starting to lean toward a HPS can for my new 800 pro but a used BMP powder lite just came up for sale locally for a good price. How obnoxious are they? I have run a rumble pack on my edge RMK for years so how would it compare to something like that?
Well they are the most obnoxious can on the market that I'm aware of for the pro.
K
Yeah that's the last thing I want and after talking to a buddy thats way more informed about these new sleds, I'll stay clear of the bmp noise maker. Looks like HPS or GGB.
Thanks!